tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post7552421107444952036..comments2024-03-17T05:26:42.972-04:00Comments on Spencerblog: Biological and Baby Mama BashedSpencerbloghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09091827187116268547noreply@blogger.comBlogger40125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-74966355077451651352021-01-08T07:00:54.829-05:002021-01-08T07:00:54.829-05:00longchamp handbags
golden goose
westbrook shoes
su...<a href="http://www.handbagslongchamp.us" rel="nofollow"><strong>longchamp handbags</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.golden-goose.us" rel="nofollow"><strong>golden goose</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.russellwestbrookshoes.us" rel="nofollow"><strong>westbrook shoes</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.supremeclothings.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>supreme</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.yeezy-shoes.us.org" rel="nofollow"><strong>yeezy</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.monclerjackets.us.org" rel="nofollow"><strong>moncler</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.stone-island.us.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>stone island outlet</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.adidasyeezyboost350.us.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>yeezy boost 350</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.supremeshirt.us.com" rel="nofollow"><strong>supreme shirt</strong></a><br /><a href="http://www.goldengooses.us" rel="nofollow"><strong>golden goose sneakers</strong></a><br />yanmaneeehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15229165146687805497noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-55269052244699485942008-12-17T10:59:00.000-05:002008-12-17T10:59:00.000-05:00But we suspect he will be unable to help himself. ...<I> But we suspect he will be unable to help himself. His obsession is too pronounced and advanced.</I><BR/><BR/>Yeah, he can’t stay away. Obsessive sociopath Libs like DDD have this burning need to share their Lib idiocy with others. He’d go crazy(er) if he didn’t have an outlet. And no one reads his blog. <BR/><BR/>G, have your IT chick check poster IPs. This will end the DDD frat boy farce once and for all.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-51284654877806146102008-12-17T08:40:00.000-05:002008-12-17T08:40:00.000-05:00Thats my gift to you Randal. Merry Christmas.Thats my gift to you Randal. Merry Christmas.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-45712491893734616522008-12-17T07:13:00.000-05:002008-12-17T07:13:00.000-05:00So, it's so long to Anon-iano and his "team" of so...So, it's so long to Anon-iano and his "team" of sociology-class sock puppets?<BR/><BR/>His angry and amusingly unhinged comments will be missed. <BR/><BR/>But we suspect he will be unable to help himself. His obsession is too pronounced and advanced.<BR/><BR/>However, if he has decided to get some sort of therapy and really does go Spencerblog comment cold turkey we wish him the best in his recovery.<BR/><BR/>p.s. We regret we had to block one of his final posts. It contained an unacceptable profanity.Spencerbloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09091827187116268547noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-43207736437381996922008-12-17T01:37:00.000-05:002008-12-17T01:37:00.000-05:00Well r, we guess you are dumb enough to go along w...Well r, we guess you are dumb enough to go along with Spencer's ideas on who we are and his hypocrisy in thinking he was secretly allowing a suspended poster to post.<BR/>The reality is that:<BR/><BR/>1) Spencer banned Mr. Diano pending an apology.<BR/><BR/>2) The only "apology" I'm aware of that Spencer ever got was posted in public on Mr. Diano's own blog.<BR/><BR/>3) Spencer is now claiming that he had already lifted the suspension despite having never received the apology he demanded (and quite the opposite).<BR/><BR/>The result is a moral victory for Mr. Diano and final proof for the rest of us that wanted to reveal Spencer's true colors.<BR/><BR/>The semester is ending and our work here is done.<BR/><BR/>This is our FINAL posting. Going out on a HUGE and TOTAL win, without any neocons correctly identifying any of us. You've been pwn3d.<BR/><BR/>Merry Christmas to Bob, and to all a good night.<BR/><BR/>We now return Spencerblog to the ghost town it was.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-36933992088727317372008-12-16T15:59:00.000-05:002008-12-16T15:59:00.000-05:00Its like shooting fish in a barrell.This is how we...<I>Its like shooting fish in a barrell.</I><BR/><BR/>This is how we like your posts, BB. Short. <BR/><BR/><BR/>Oh, and it's <I>barrel</I>. <BR/><BR/>[BANG!]Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-72285560298522023252008-12-16T13:24:00.000-05:002008-12-16T13:24:00.000-05:00If I were any dumber I’d try to convince everyone ...If I were any dumber I’d try to convince everyone here that my wacko backwards Lib views were being supported here by a number of frat boys who all just happen to share my writing style and limp sense of humor. And if I were <I>really</I> dumb I'd try to keep up the lame ruse even after I had been busted! Lol…Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-6896032246439392022008-12-16T13:21:00.000-05:002008-12-16T13:21:00.000-05:00Its like shooting fish in a barrell.Its like shooting fish in a barrell.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-83514501150142529492008-12-16T13:08:00.000-05:002008-12-16T13:08:00.000-05:00R said "(sometimes just reading his stuff makes me...R said "(sometimes just reading his stuff makes me dumber!)"<BR/><BR/>Is that possible?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-67336151320568165382008-12-16T12:42:00.000-05:002008-12-16T12:42:00.000-05:00R- Gee, there were only two rules and you couldn'...R-<BR/> Gee, there were only two rules and you couldn't even keep that straight.<BR/><BR/> If you were any dumber, your brain wouldn't know how to keep your heart beating or you'd forget how to breath.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-91299601710313421512008-12-16T11:48:00.000-05:002008-12-16T11:48:00.000-05:00Oops. I meant Rule #2. (sometimes just reading his...Oops. I meant Rule #2. <BR/><BR/>(sometimes just reading his stuff makes me dumber!)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-35221107368937685602008-12-16T11:01:00.000-05:002008-12-16T11:01:00.000-05:00Look at that long petty post up there! Lol...If I ...Look at that long petty post up there! Lol...<BR/><BR/>If I may break Rule #1... <BR/>I believe DDD is really a whiny little girl.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-22749398886726727452008-12-16T10:15:00.000-05:002008-12-16T10:15:00.000-05:00one more thing about extreme liberals like ananymo...one more thing about extreme liberals like ananymous-iano - they clearly carry the mantra of never being wrong and refuse to come down to earth and show an ounce of humility , their pride's too inflated to do so. And THAT is why CHANGE can never be theirs.steve mcdonaldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06475435322052587508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-74035805301695867712008-12-16T10:11:00.000-05:002008-12-16T10:11:00.000-05:00Where would we be without Sociology majors?Still, ...Where would we be without Sociology majors?<BR/><BR/><BR/>Still, I believe anonymous-iano owes Gil an Apology for going off the deep end on the Barney Frank statements. There was zero gay bashing in Gil's post. I repeat ZERO (The mind sees what the mind wants to see)<BR/><BR/>Second, anonymous-iano owes all of us at Spencerblog an apology for insulting our intelligence, coming around and posting as "anonymous" despite claiming never to return to this "blog of bigotry". Personally, he wrote to me that he was "done" with this place. Than why not stay away? Go to your Daily KOS or Huffington Post and be happy!<BR/><BR/>Posting as anonymous despite cleqrly showing your true colors through your writings renders all the criticizm it can get.steve mcdonaldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06475435322052587508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-1818586273629659622008-12-16T09:08:00.000-05:002008-12-16T09:08:00.000-05:00Anon - You use Romney as an example, and thats my ...Anon - You use Romney as an example, and thats my point. If you had different ideas at one time, I want to know about them. I dont want you to hide it from me, because to do so deprives me of making an educated decission at the polls. The more I know about someone who is running for office, the better I feel about my decission. Being secretive is not my idea of starting out on the right foot. I understand where you are coming from. Do you understand where Im coming from?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-41737002062303924712008-12-16T08:42:00.000-05:002008-12-16T08:42:00.000-05:00Rules? RULES? There ain't no rules in a blog fight...Rules? RULES? There ain't no rules in a blog fight!<BR/><BR/>The suspension on Anon-iano was lifted despite his profanity-laced hissy fit, because it pleased me to do so. <BR/><BR/>His nutty ideas are fun for others to bat around.<BR/><BR/>Obviously, once the the suspension was lifted and we started making fun of Anon-iano for posting anonymously (not to mention his bizarre removal all his previous comments from this blog - others were free to make fun of him as well.<BR/><BR/>Besides, we do so enjoy Anon-iano's pretending not to be who he is but someone who thinks the world of this man, Diano and his brilliant ideas. <BR/><BR/>He is nothing if not entertaining. <BR/><BR/>Yes, "Happy War on Christmas," Anon-iano. You make glad the heart of bloghood.Spencerbloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09091827187116268547noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-81047664850464503712008-12-16T00:07:00.000-05:002008-12-16T00:07:00.000-05:00Bob- People change their minds on issues. Look at...Bob-<BR/> People change their minds on issues. Look at Mitt Romney who was pro-choice and once claimed he was a better friend for gay rights than Ted Kennedy. For a guy that wants to be a judge someday, an offhand comment or joke in poor taste could be taken out of context as biased in a campaign, even if the comment was made when he was a student.<BR/>Look at how the GOP dug up a college report Michelle Obama did on some controversial figure, and tried to play it as though she admired that person.<BR/><BR/>Bob, no offense meant on your spelling when we should have used the term "typos". We were trying to compliment your reasoning while make a distinction with style issues. We certainly never meant to imply that you couldn't spell.<BR/><BR/>Gil-<BR/>Banned vs suspended? A distinction without a difference.<BR/>We finally tracked down your key rules, from September (thank you Google):<BR/>1) "Until he [Diano] contacts me personally and apologizes, his posting privileges here will remain suspended."<BR/><BR/>2) "Additionally, and to be fair, any comments bashing Diano will also be rejected out of hand."<BR/><BR/>Well, rule #2 gets broken on a regular basis. And as for rule #1, you've got a better shot scoring a lap dance from Palin.<BR/><BR/>Back to your fish vs mock vs logic:<BR/>1) Mocking Diano doesn't mock us. But, it does break your Rule #2.<BR/><BR/>2) If you really believed we were Mr. Diano, then your demand for an apology in Rule #1 was empty and you invalidated it with the first posting you allowed that you mistook for one of his. Logic.<BR/><BR/>3) If Diano were posting, without apologizing, he would be the mocker and you the mockery. Again, violation of Rule #1.<BR/><BR/>4) Strictly speaking, by tying rules #1 and #2 together and claiming your own "fairness", and then repeatedly breaking Rule #2 there is only one logical result: Rule #1 has been so repeatedly invalidated that Mr. Diano is no longer suspended.<BR/><BR/>Instead of pretending to ban (oops, we mean "suspend") posters, just filter out the offensive postings.<BR/><BR/>Here are your two choices:<BR/>1) Official un-suspend Mr. Diano, since you've been un-officially dropping the suspension every time you thought we were he.<BR/>2) Continue to pretend you are suspending someone who you think is still posting (and look foolish for doing so).<BR/><BR/>Hint: if you suspend us, it doesn't change all the times you thought we were Mr. Diano and you let us post anyway, so you've already lost with choice #2.<BR/><BR/>The semester is over next week anyway. Merry Christmas (or Happy War on Christmas) to Mr. Diano <BR/>1) for either getting his suspension undone <BR/>or <BR/>2) for continuing to make Spencer look foolish via his persistent legacyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-37668367008297727852008-12-15T21:05:00.000-05:002008-12-15T21:05:00.000-05:00This is getting a bit insane. We should start call...This is getting a bit insane. We should start calling this the Paranoid Post. <BR/>ANON SAID " If we boost Bob's spelling and stuff, it's the same arguments we make (and the entire Dem party makes)." Maybe Anon should proof read his own posts before being critical of others.<BR/><BR/>As for posting as Anon so as not to have past posts destroy a political career, that seems a bit unethical to me. If you are starting off on that foot, maybe you'd better stay out of politics. We already have our share of hypocrits in office.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-76275289507529749312008-12-15T18:31:00.000-05:002008-12-15T18:31:00.000-05:00Anon-iano was not banned. He was suspended. We don...Anon-iano was not banned. He was suspended. <BR/><BR/>We don't fish. We mock.<BR/><BR/>So once again, good luck with that political career.Spencerbloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09091827187116268547noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-57509767271002837882008-12-15T12:37:00.000-05:002008-12-15T12:37:00.000-05:00We were actually referring to a lawyer we know who...We were actually referring to a lawyer we know who blogs and ran for judge once. As for Diano removing his posts to run for office, that makes NO sense, since his Sestak and other blogs haven't been removed. After what he posted about Sestak, he couldn't get himself elected dog catcher.<BR/><BR/>We guess you are suffering from "Diano Derangement Syndrome". (Yes, referencing your Kennedy derangement nonsense elsewhere.)<BR/><BR/>You banned Diano. You post our stuff and the other Anons. Therefore, you don't really believe any of us are him, but you are in fact fishing to find out who we really are. Though I think you are really "r".<BR/><BR/>Bob wrote: "Funny. I dont remember seeing Randal there when Gil invited everyone out for beers." Probably because they are the same person. Gil gets to post wild stuff under the "r" pseudonym and not pay the price.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-76358378903564472642008-12-15T11:00:00.000-05:002008-12-15T11:00:00.000-05:00Lib idiocy indeed stands on its own merits regardl...Lib idiocy indeed stands on its own merits regardless of who posts it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-79797036725193513942008-12-15T10:58:00.000-05:002008-12-15T10:58:00.000-05:00But we are happy to hear Anon-iano has friends.Yea...<I>But we are happy to hear Anon-iano has friends.</I><BR/><BR/>Yeah! Who woulda guessed?! <BR/><BR/><BR/><I>You must be one of them. Sounds like you take dictation.</I> <BR/><BR/>LMAO! Yeah, in more ways than one! <BR/>Ew. <BR/><BR/>(I'm still not buying it, DDD/ Anon X3.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-76872070033399096752008-12-15T07:33:00.000-05:002008-12-15T07:33:00.000-05:00"Besides, we might want to run for office someday ..."Besides, we might want to run for office someday and don't want our blogs, myspace, facebook, etc. used against us."<BR/><BR/>Or comments... Finally, an explantion for all those self-removed Diano posts. <BR/><BR/>Good luck with that political career.Spencerbloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09091827187116268547noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-88683064980604355862008-12-15T00:12:00.000-05:002008-12-15T00:12:00.000-05:00Soylent- Sorry to hear about Mr. Diano. Wish him ...Soylent-<BR/> Sorry to hear about Mr. Diano. Wish him well for us. However, it does kind of spoil our ruse, as we altered our posting style a few weeks ago when "r" and the gang started mistaking us for him, to prove a point (see below).<BR/><BR/> Since we couldn't find his postings here, we did an Internet search and found some of his Sestak and other blog stuff. The arguments he made were the same as ours, and Bob's and a few others. The only things we really noticed to distinguish his posts were that he was pretty good with grammar, capitalization and punctuation, and he didn't hesitate to call a bigot a bigot. If we boost Bob's spelling and stuff, it's the same arguments we make (and the entire Dem party makes).<BR/><BR/>The only area where we really disagreed with Mr. Diano was in using his name vs anonymous. As evidenced by Spencer, R and others, once they associate a person with a viewpoint, they not only get rabid but they make assumptions outside of the argument and ignore the merits (and engage in personal attacks). Similarly, when one sees a post by r, there is the immediate assumption of bigotry or lunacy. When Scott posts, the baseline is that he's a religious zealot.<BR/><BR/>We decided to take the approach of the Founding Fathers, who used "Publius" to author the Federalist Papers. The ideas and arguments should stand on their own, without regard to who made them. We think the Founding Father would have viewed something like the Internet as everyone having their own printing press.<BR/><BR/>The "point" (for those that missed it) is that knowing the poster biases your reading of their post. <BR/><BR/>There are cases, like when recommending a product, that the identity of the advocate should be known to avoid conflicts of interest. But when it comes to debating American values, Anonymous is the blog version of Publius.<BR/>Besides, we might want to run for office someday and don't want our blogs, myspace, facebook, etc. used against us.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5463472772679876402.post-67563990468985748792008-12-14T00:14:00.000-05:002008-12-14T00:14:00.000-05:00We are all, of course, very sorry to hear Anon-ian...We are all, of course, very sorry to hear Anon-iano hurt his hand.<BR/><BR/>Did he hurt it so bad he can't work? Or type?<BR/><BR/>But we are happy to hear Anon-iano has friends. You must be one of them. Sounds like you take dictation.<BR/><BR/>If you really are a friend of his, and not just another Anon-iano sock puppet, could you answer this question about him: <BR/><BR/>Is he as short and flamboyant as we've been told?Spencerbloghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09091827187116268547noreply@blogger.com