Thursday, October 18, 2007

The Great Sereni

Defrocked Penn Delco solicitor Mark Sereni continues to amaze and amuse.

After being fired from his position last month, he has continued to pop up at Penn Delco school board meetings. Odd that, since Sereni doesn't live in the district and owns no property there. It can't be that he considers the Penn Delco solicitorship his personal property can it?

I am told he was there again Wednesday night, the same day his old buddy Keith Crego was arrested and charged with multiple felonies (theft, bribery, forgery, drugs).

Crego committed many of his alleged crimes while his friend Sereni was apparently busy writing him glowing letters of recommendation and approving the legality of expensive (some would say, inappropriate) insurance plan giveaways to district employees.

Also charged Wednesday was former superintendent Leslye Abrutyn for her part in Crego's Quick Start scheme.

She claimed to investigators that Crego "coerced and intimidated" her into being a secret partner in Quick Buck by threatening to withhold a positive recommendation letter should she ever seek employment elsewhere.

That explanation just doesn't wash as I explain in tomorrow's print column.

With Crego facing upwards of 200 years in jail one wonders if he might consider sharing any information with authorities that might lighten a future prison sentence.

We shall see.

In the meantime, Mark Sereni continues to be deeply interested in the goings on at Penn Delco school board meetings even though the district is no longer paying him.

Is he a great guy or what?

UPDATE: Penn Delco Board President Dave Seitz tells me he has filed a formal complaint against Mark Sereni with the Disciplinary Board of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for his threatening to sue district and the board if it chose to replace him.

I asked Seitz if he got any legal advice before he filed his complaint.
"I don't need an attorney to tell me that's (a lawyer threatening to sue his own clients) is not the right thing to do," he said.

Seitz said he is a little surprised that Sereni would continue to show up at Penn Delco meetings.

"I thought he would go about his business."

But, he said, Sereni's presence isn't going to bother him.

"I could care less," Seitz said. "Mr. Sereni is no issue to me."


Anonymous Anonymous said...

What the hell is your problem you ass? Aren't 2 arrests of PDSD high-up officials enough to take your focus off this poor guy? what a loser you are.

October 18, 2007 at 9:01 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Enough is enough!! We get it!! You don't like Mark Sereni! Move on!! Your obsessive coverage of him is ludicrous.

October 18, 2007 at 10:38 PM 
Blogger Spencerblog said...

Whose the bigger loser? A guy who was fired from his job and still shows up at his former place of employment like he belongs there, or the people who notice him there and think that's just freakin' weird?

October 18, 2007 at 10:48 PM 
Blogger Spencerblog said...

Enough IS enough. But just who is obsessing here? When do you think Mark Sereni is going to get it?

October 18, 2007 at 10:51 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Amen Gil! What's it going to get him to understand he is no longer wanted. Isn't there some kind of stalking law for this crap?
It would be funny if it wasn't so scary.

October 18, 2007 at 11:05 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You Gil Spencer are the loser. Get it? The guy has done nothing wrong. Find something else to write about or shut the hell up, freakshow.

October 18, 2007 at 11:08 PM 
Blogger Spencerblog said...

You can't kid me. Mark Sereni wants to be written about or he wouldn't be behaving this way.

October 18, 2007 at 11:18 PM 
Anonymous randal said...

Seems to me the biggest losers are folks who come and read a blog of someone they hate and are so upset that they post childish angry insults anonymously. That’s pretty darn losery. Cowardly too.

October 18, 2007 at 11:31 PM 
Anonymous law prof said...

Gil, I was truly hoping that given that Mr. Sereni has been vindicated, your next headline would read, "I am Sorry Mr. Sereni for Having Defamed You All These Months." If you detect a bit of sarcasm in my tone, perhaps that is because I am, as a women's rights advocate, deeply offended by your retort that Mr. Sereni "wants to be written about (actually, defamed)or he wouldn't be behaving this way." It reminds me too much of a rapist's self-deluded justification that the rape victim "really wanted it or else she would not have dressed that way."

October 19, 2007 at 12:11 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I find it all quite bizarre that someone who fought so hard to keep a job and went to the extremes that he did to keep said job. Would humiliate hiself by coming back to meetings where he knows the people of the district had asked for his resignation.And a board of directors voted to terminate his law firm. Where is this mans pride and common sense? Could there be more to this behavior than meets the eye maybe there's a lawsuit in the works or better yet maybe a comeback when a new board is elected?? Now that truly will not set well with the masses in Penn-Delco. We shall have to just wait and see where all this cat and mouse stuff leads too. Stay tuned I'm sure Mark Sereni isn't finished with the people of Penn-Delco just yet.

October 19, 2007 at 12:37 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To deeply offended law prof:

To equte Sereni with rape victim is bizarre. Sereni loves seeing his name in the paper. If you don't agree, why is he still showing up? Did it ever occur to you that he is a non-issue, but that since he is still showing up (when he doesn't live in district) he is making himself the focus of speculation?

October 19, 2007 at 5:43 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think he just wants the other people in administration and those on the board who might have been apart of the problem revealed.

October 19, 2007 at 7:07 AM 
Anonymous Jeremy19015 said...

To the Einstein who responded to Law Prof - If simply sitting in the audience at a public Penn Delco school board meeting is enough to get your name in Spencer's column, then how come EVERYBODY ELSE's name is not in there?

Gee, why not publish the whole audience list? That would make newsworthy reading! Hey look, Aunt Bertha finally made it to a Penn Delco meeting! That crazy cat!

Law Prof is right. Spencer's using the lamest excuse I've ever heard for continuing to bash a man.

Move on, Spencer. Sereni hasn't been charged with a thing. Stop lumping him in with the other two so you can try to justify your months and months of slander.

October 19, 2007 at 8:13 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gil I have your next scoop for you...Mark Sereni was at the Aston Giant last weekend...buying MILK!
When will this madness end??

Get a real job.

October 19, 2007 at 8:52 AM 
Blogger Spencerblog said...

Get a real job?

I will if he will.

But since you mentioned it, was the milk fat-free? Does he have a receipt for it? Did he threaten to sue the cashier for not waiting on him fast enough? Has he started to hang out in the dairy section for long periods of time, button-holing other shoppers to express his concern about high milk prices?

Keep me posted.

October 19, 2007 at 10:09 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

pay close attention to the abrupt and recent resignations in and around the pdsd......perhaps mr sereni is wondering and watching who's next.....i predict this will dirtbag crego will chirp like a birdy and drag down many more....including local (and adored) politicians....can't wait

October 19, 2007 at 11:22 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gil, you are either jealous of Mark Sereni or suffering from unrequited love. Will you please stop making such an ass of yourself? You are actually making him look better and better as you make yourself look ludicrous.

October 19, 2007 at 12:32 PM 
Blogger Spencerblog said...

Sorry, I'm not much for taking advice from the ranks of anonymous posters, though I do love getting it.

October 19, 2007 at 12:44 PM 
Anonymous Quick Start Parent said...

Gil, I love you! If it wasn't for you and Loretta all these months, we would not have received any information. I enjoy your reporting on Sereni and I get it. This isn't over. I am very curious what Sereni is doing at the meetings and what it means for our ditrict. And when was Sereni vindicated? Did I miss something? I think there is still a lot to come out about that man. Who are all of these anonymous posts from? Sereni?
Thank you for everything you have done during this past year. I am so relieved that it is finally starting to come to an end.

October 19, 2007 at 1:48 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well Gil, I'm not much for believing everything I read in your pieces which are fed largely by nameless (aka anonymous) sources.

October 19, 2007 at 2:40 PM 
Blogger Pro Christ Pro Gun said...

Hi Jeremy 19015:

About being Einstein, I may be closer to that characterization than you. When I posted a response at 543 a.m. I was in a rush to go to the gym, and did not have time to put together all of my thoughts on this issue. Also, I see that my "a" stuck hence I misspelled equate. Sorry.

What you don't seem to understand is that the Sereni coverage is not what people are making up about him, but what he is doing that makes people write about him. For instance, Penn Delco has been in the throws of discontent for months, and Sereni was their lawyer. Sereni has now been fired, yet he still sits in the meetings and takes notes. I know that he does not live in the school district so you have to wonder why he would show up. Seems strange to me that he would show up at his former client's place of business after he has been fired. I know that I would stay away from a client that fired me.

And by that way, my name is C. Scott Shields, Esquire, and I approve of this message. Who are you?

October 19, 2007 at 2:41 PM 
Blogger Franny Ward said...

Sereni - Abrutyn - Crego - Don't indictments come in three's? Say it isn't so Gil.

October 19, 2007 at 3:12 PM 
Anonymous Jeremy19015 said...

ProChrist ProGun - Oh, you're a lawyer, huh? And an unendorsed candidate for Delco judge, huh? And have rather ultra-conservative, "faith"-driven views on certain social issues, like gay and other minority rights, huh?

No wonder you're a Spencer supporter!

You most be one of Spencer's unnamed "legal experts"!

Attorney Shields, I'd rather be represented by a gay atheist than you!

October 19, 2007 at 3:58 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Franny Ward,

There WERE three indictments: Crego, Abrutyn and Quick Start.

Just be careful not to get yourself into trouble here. Sereni wasn't indicted, and the Delco DA said there won't be any more.

Gil's doing a good enough job slandering Sereni without you having to jump into the fire too.

October 19, 2007 at 4:03 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Spencerblog: If you are going to discount everything said by people posting anonymously on here, why not remove that as an option? Otherwise, maybe you can stop whining.

October 19, 2007 at 4:45 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What I find so clear (and amusing) is that wussy Dave Seitz is scared shi(r)tless of Mark Sereni. Otherwise he really wouldn't care about his showing up at a (public!) meeting, and definitely wouldn't go running to some opinion columnist with news of every move Sereni makes.

Seitz and Spencer are lucky if they have 2 brains cells put together.

October 19, 2007 at 4:49 PM 
Anonymous For law prof said...

This is a question for law prof (Attorney Shields, thanks in advance for not sharing your "expertise," such as it is):

Let's say a broken-down opinion columnist and his corrupt sources (let's say they are school board members) publicly defame a school board solicitor, a limited purpose public figure, just about every week for a period of, oh, four months.

And let's say the broken-down opinion columnist and his corrupt sources get the solicitor fired from that solicitorship as a result of their near-constant public defamation.

Can the broken-down opinion columnist and his corrupt sources continue to attempt to shield their defamation of the former solicitor ad infinitum with the "actual malice" standard once the solicitor is no longer the solicitor? I wonder.

October 19, 2007 at 5:04 PM 
Anonymous randal davis said...

Hey, Mr. Shields, I’ve seen your stuff printed in the DT. Good stuff. We could use more public figures to be so plain spoken about the problems in our society. It’s a shame those who disagree with your views always resort to character attacks rather than engaging in honest debate. That’s not in the spirit of Free Speech. For all their chirping about "tolerance", turns out the Left is the most intolerant of all. So much for honest debate from the Left.

October 19, 2007 at 5:26 PM 
Blogger Pro Christ Pro Gun said...

Jeremy 19015 and law prof:

First, why are either of you anonymous? Who are you and what do you do?

For just Jeremy 19015:

Do you think homosexuals are a "minority" or that homosexuality makes you a minority? If yes, how do you deine minority? Remember what Lawrence v. Texas said about homosexuality.

Law Prof:

If you really are a law prof or a lawyer, or even a lawyer wanna be, engage me in an intellectual legal debate about this issue surrounding Sereni, or any other legal issue. If you are a law prof I will let you bring me to your school and we can debate in front of all of your charges. I will even let them heckle me and throw rotten vegetables. How about we debate how the US Supreme Court has threatened our sovereignty as a nation? Do you want to debate? I don't call people names, I make arguments based on logic, reason, the law and sometimes the Bible.

How about both of you together? You can tag team me in a debate.

Name the place.

October 19, 2007 at 5:55 PM 
Blogger Pro Christ Pro Gun said...

jeremy 19015:

One other thing, if you would rather be represented by a gay atheist than someone like me, then you must know a gay atheist lawyer that is willing to advocate as passionately as I do on behalf of my clients, some of whom are homosexuals.

Why are you anonymous? Are you afraid of something?

October 19, 2007 at 5:59 PM 
Anonymous law prof said...

To the person who inquired of Law Prof,

You're not one of my former students, now are you?

Very intelligent question, I must say. But I'll have to "pass" on answering that one and defer to Mr. Spencer's legal counsel, from whom I hope Mr. Spencer has already received a very intelligent answer.

Thanks for your question.

October 19, 2007 at 6:10 PM 
Anonymous jeremy19015 said...

Scott aka ProChrist ProGun - You've asked whether I'm afraid of something. I can tell you, on behalf of my kids, my wife, my friends, my neighbors, and my fellow community members, yes, I'm afraid of you and your kind.

All - Please, do NOT elect
C. Scott Shields, Esquire for judge. May God save us from extremists!

October 19, 2007 at 6:16 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yo ProChrist Pro Gun, I'd think twice about making it so easy for us to find your web site, buddy. Not exactly main stream thought!

October 19, 2007 at 6:18 PM 
Anonymous randal said...

Extremists on the Left are worse. No, they really are worse.

October 19, 2007 at 6:24 PM 
Anonymous June Carter said...

First, let me say the comments about Mr. Sereni's "vindication" are moot. There was no accusation. Your expression that he has been "vindicated" implies he was a target of the GJ investigation.

Second, all (and I use that term in a DSM IV kind of way) of you taking shots and Gil and Scott really need to step back.

Fact: The residents of Penn-Delco simply wanted a new solicitor. He was asked to leave nicely. We were forced into the petition. Enough said.

Fact: Mr. Sereni sued anonymous forum posters and a petition signer claiming "defamatory" remarks. (I see he filed his Praecipe to Reissue Summons to keep that baby alive).

Fact: Mr. Sereni is still attending school board meetings in Penn-Delco. He is neither employed by nor a resident of the district.

As an aside, Scott, I may be calling you with regard to fact number two. If anyone knows Constitutional law it's you.

October 19, 2007 at 7:05 PM 
Anonymous randal said...

I looked at his site. He’s got quite an impressive resume`.
If you guys could get past your hatred for Christians, Repubs and all that is Right maybe you’d see this. Somehow I doubt you get so upset when a radical Liberal judge is spouting his idiocy and legislating from the bench.

October 19, 2007 at 8:42 PM 
Anonymous heck said...

Pro Christ Pro Gun lawyer:
you may want to beware of getting your facts from "june carter."

Besides the fact that there's nothing like hearing "legal" banter from a frustrated paralegal, you might want to take a look at, where june carter lives and where the second coming is fodder for jokes.

October 19, 2007 at 9:56 PM 
Anonymous Pro Marple Newtown parent said...

To the person who said if anyone knows constitutional law it is Scott Shields,that may be right, but if anyone knows constitutional law BETTER than Scott Shields it is Mark Sereni. Sereni recently beat Shields's former client in a big first amendment case.

That's why Shields is on here ripping into Sereni. Sour grapes. That's a great quality in a judge, isn't it?

October 19, 2007 at 10:28 PM 
Anonymous Message for Mr. Sereni said...


You are no longer allowed to go to public meetings and sit quietly in the audience.

Gil Spencer and Dave Seitz do not like it. It makes them feel funny and want to hurt you.

If you keep it up, they may ban you from public places altogether. And from sitting. And writing. And some other stuff, when they think of it.

Thank you.

October 19, 2007 at 10:36 PM 
Anonymous Concerned Residents said...

Dave Seitz is not an honest person. He is a liar, has been caught publicly. I find it quite odd that Seitz(not credible),has filed a formal complaint against Serini with the Disciplinary Board of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

What about the PD administrators and the transportation supervisor? How come Seitz doesn't care about what they did that was crooooooocked endangering the students and residence of this community.

This would be a good class action suite for Pro Christ Pro Gun to handle on behalf of the Penn Delco students, who's lives were in danger.

By the way, does anyone out there know if witnesses to this could file a PFA against school officials on behalf of the students?

Or if there is any other option?


Concerned Residents/Witnesses

October 20, 2007 at 9:51 AM 
Anonymous Wallflower said...

This is in response to "heck said's post to Pro Christ Pro Gun lawyer in reference to June Carter, i.e. "there's nothing like hearing legal banter from a frustrated paralegal." What a mean-spirited thing to say. I will take the "legal banter" of a frustrated paralegal over the legalese of an "ethically-challenged" attorney any day!!

I am not a PD taxpayer, nor am I intimately familiar with the individual lawyers/school board members being named in this blog or the investigation in PDSD. I, myself, am not a lawyer, board member, school or public official. I am, however, a student collecting research throughout PA on school district solicitors, superintendants, and public/elected offical's involved in school district fraud/scandals and who have "fallen from grace".

From the plethora of documentation I have gathered and in researching the controversies surrounding many of these school districts, the common denominator appears to be that many of these Districts are mired in countless lawsuits and PROTRACTED, SIX-FIGURE LITIGATION. Without a doubt, the most POWERFUL person sitting at the table is the District's legal counsel.

Without proper Board and public oversight of yearly lawfirm retainers, billings, legal fees, potential CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, and an understanding of the full scope of legal services being provided to the district by its solicitor and their firm, a school district could easily become hostage to a lawfirm that could monopolize (and polarize) a school district in countless six/seven figure lawsuits, the costs of which are subsidized by the taxpayers of that school district.

The Right-to-Know Law must be utilized by taxpayers to keep abreast of and investigate the Legal Services being provided to our school Districts, investigate CONFLICTS OF INTEREST and, if necessary, to hold members of the bar working on behalf of school districts, accountable to the taxpayers of that school district.

October 20, 2007 at 1:30 PM 
Blogger Pro Christ Pro Gun said...

Hi Law Prof:

I don't think that I was one of your students, but I can't be sure since you do not disclose your identity. If I was one of your students I must have missed the class where you taught your students how to be post anonymously.

October 21, 2007 at 9:31 AM 
Blogger Pro Christ Pro Gun said...


You hurt my feelings. What about my viewpoint worries you so much? I am actually a very mainstream person, with very mainstream thought and ideas.

What do you belive in?

October 21, 2007 at 9:34 AM 
Blogger Pro Christ Pro Gun said...

marple parent:

Get you facts right. My firm was out of that case very early. And it had nothing to do with the lawsuit filed against Sereni for defaming my client publicly.

Also, I believe that the marple case is on appeal so the First Amendment may live to see the light of day in Marple's churches of Political Correctness, the public schools of indoctrination.

October 21, 2007 at 9:38 AM 
Blogger Franny Ward said...

Anonymous said...
Hey Franny Ward,

There WERE three indictments: Crego, Abrutyn and Quick Start.

Just be careful not to get yourself into trouble here. Sereni wasn't indicted, and the Delco DA said there won't be any more.

Gil's doing a good enough job slandering Sereni without you having to jump into the fire too.

Ah yes.. The evil "S" word. I am not "Slandering" anyone. And, unlike you, I have a strong belief that the DOJ is investigating Sereni. What makes me feel this way? Referrer logs my boy! Referrer logs. When you grow up and start your own web site you'll know what I'm talking about.

October 21, 2007 at 11:02 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you people think that all those charges are going to stick, you must be nuts. They put on a million charges and then they take some away. What i don't get is how can two people. John Steffy and John Green not be charged for tampering with their paperwork but Crego and Abrutyn can? Also, how can the owner of Quickstart not be charged but others can? Selective enforcement could spell trouble for the DA's office. Just my opinion.

And Gil, in my opinion you are a loser. You sit back and wait for others to mess up and then you write about it. Try putting yourself on the line for once. You are dirt as far as I am concerned.

October 21, 2007 at 1:14 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Franny Ward-

Shouldn't you put up or shut up about Sereni?

What do you claim the DOJ (which I understand means the federal Department of Justice) is investigating Sereni for?

If you don't have facts to back up your claim, then you really should stop slandering Sereni, and your friend Gil really should delete your sladerous comment.

Don't you both think?

October 21, 2007 at 1:58 PM 
Blogger ddbl133 said...

Gil, the people who need to be investigated now are Crego's wife (see article where she found incriminating paperwork and drugs, instead of turning them in to police she puts them in the bank in a safe deposit box?) and District Justice Murphy (a crony of Crego's) who should have recused himself, and who let Crego out of jail, before he could be tagged for electronic home monitoring, against the DA's advice, needless to say.

October 22, 2007 at 4:18 PM 
Anonymous Laughing at Spencer said...

Since so many people have commented on how obsessive your coverage of Sereni is, I won't delve into how much of a stalker you appear to be. I will, however, point out the obvious reason you're still writing about him: readership. Look at the number of comments on all of your other blog posts. Most don't have a single comment. You post about Sereni and people actually care, so they comment. Obviously you don't have any talent or any idea what else to write about. Like you, it's absolutely pathetic.

And yes, I laughed at the "journalist" using the wrong "whose" - 10/18 10:48 PM.

October 22, 2007 at 5:47 PM 
Anonymous also laughing at spencer said...

To laughing at spencer: I was just about to post exactly what you said...until I saw your post. You are absolutely right, it has been a long time since anybody paid any attention to Gil Spencer. Now he has leeched on to Mark Sereni in an attempt to give his own career a boost. Gil is the stalker, the obsessive one, the loser. He is everything he has tried to make Sereni out to be. And I believe he has definitely crossed several lines in his treatment of Sereni, professionally, ethically, and, I think, possibly legally. But desperate times call for desperate measures. And he's a desperate man.

October 22, 2007 at 6:37 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Listen, the guy is a dope. Why don't you see that. Also, to the person who said go after Crego's wife, are you crazy? You or me have no idea what she found or didn't. You want her investigated? You are as much as a dope as spencer.

October 22, 2007 at 7:22 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To laughing at Spencer and also laughing at Spencer:

You two don't get it. Gil is reporting what has happened with Sereni, and there is nothing legally, morally or ethically wrong with that. The problem is people like you that attack the messenger. Engage in an honest debate without name calling.

October 22, 2007 at 9:07 PM 
Anonymous also laughing said...

To anonymous: What turnip truck did you fall off of? Even Spencer doesn't call himself a reporter. Spencer's not the messenger, he's the message.

October 22, 2007 at 11:05 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

HI also laughing:

I did not just fall off the turnip truck. Gil reports (writes about) all sorts of stuff. Why do you attack him for writing about Sereni? Sereni brought this on himself. Are you Sereni or a friend of Sereni?

October 23, 2007 at 6:32 AM 
Blogger Franny Ward said...

Anonymous said...

Franny Ward-

Shouldn't you put up or shut up about Sereni?

There we go again, using the "S" word. Since when is having a "strong belief" about something make one a "slanderer?" Do you believe in GOD?

October 23, 2007 at 7:42 AM 
Anonymous Also Laughing at Spencer said...

Hi Anonymous,

I'm not Sereni and, according to your Gospel of Spencer, Sereni has no friends and deserves no friends, so we can eliminate that possibility too.

As Law Prof wisely pointed out here to Spencer himself, blaming Sereni for "bringing this on himself" is a disgusting and amateurish attempt to blame the victim. You should be ashamed of yourself for regurgitating that.

Are you Spencer, his one friend, or an employee of the Daily Times?

Also Laughing at Spencer

October 23, 2007 at 9:01 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Franny Ward - I guess that's your idea of shutting up, since you can't put up regarding any mysterious "DOJ" investigation.
And yeah, I believe in God, and in His Commandment, "Thou Shalt Not Lie." Practice what you preach, Franny Ward.

Hey Gil - I can't believe you haven't deleted this "gentleman's" slanderous comment!

October 23, 2007 at 9:06 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Franny ward is an idiot imo. He is a do nothing that is just like spencer. Sitting back and giving opinion and never stepping up to the plate. That is what these types of people do. Just a waste of space. Franny Ward. You kidding me. He found out how to do a blog and now he is an authority on everything.

October 23, 2007 at 10:46 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gil where is the breaking news on this?

Magisterial District Judge 32-2-38
Docket Number: CR-0000350-07
Criminal Docket
Page 1 of 1
Issue Date:
File Date: 10/23/2007
Case Disp: Waived for Court
Disp Date: 10/23/2007
Requested: $0.00
Judge Assigned: MURPHY, DAVID J
OTN: K 512722-0
Arresting Agency: DELAWARE CNTY, CID
Arresting Officer: WORRILOW, THOMAS H
Complaint/Incident #
Township: ASTON TWP
Date Of Birth: 03/23/1962
Sex: Male
Race: White
Bail Type: Unsecured
Bail Status: Set
Bail Amount: $10000.00
Status Date: 10/23/2007
Posting Date:
O/S Amount: $10000.00
# Charge Description Disposition
1 65 § 1103 §§ A RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES - CONFLICT OF INTEREST Waived for Court (Lower Court)
2 65 § 1103 §§ F RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES - ENTERING CONTRACTS Waived for Court (Lower Court)
Schedule Date Event Type Status
10/23/2007 Arraignment
10/23/2007 Preliminary Hearing WAV
Total Due: $0.00
Total Paid: $0.00
Total Adj: $0.00
Balance: $0.00
MEDIA, PA 19063
Recent entries made in the court filing offices may not be immediately reflected on these docket sheets. Neither the courts of the Unified Judicial System of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania nor the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts assumes any liability for inaccurate or delayed data, errors or
omissions on these docket sheets. Docket sheet information should not be used in place of a criminal history background check, which can only be
provided by the Pennsylvania State Police. Employers who do not comply with the provisions of the Criminal History Record Information Act (18 Pa.C.S.
Section 9101 et seq.) may be subject to civil liability as set forth in 18 Pa.C.S. Section 9183.
1200 Printed: 10/23/2007 1:20 pmHª

October 23, 2007 at 1:45 PM 
Anonymous disgusted with spencer said...

Gil is only interested in REAL news. What is the arrest of a school board member compared to Mark Sereni's attending public meetings?

What other reason could Gil possibly have for not sharing his valuable opinion on this news? Huh. I wonder?

October 23, 2007 at 3:19 PM 
Anonymous it's over spencer said...

About the arrest of the Penn Delco school board member for ethics violations:

What an interesting turn of events. So Gil, was this the insignificant conflict you referred to in an earlier piece? Looks like the DA didn't agree with your whitewashing attempt. Gotta watch those sources!

This is one even you can't spin to blame on Mark Sereni!!!!

October 23, 2007 at 5:46 PM 
Blogger Franny Ward said...

Anonymous said...
Franny ward is an idiot imo. He is a do nothing that is just like spencer. Sitting back and giving opinion and never stepping up to the plate. That is what these types of people do. Just a waste of space. Franny Ward. You kidding me. He found out how to do a blog and now he is an authority on everything.

Yes I am and I thank you for noticing that I've been on blogger since 2001. Now I have a question for Gil - Who is John Green?

October 24, 2007 at 2:38 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Do you find it interseting that Spencer hasn't said anything about Green? Green has been running off at the mouth about how he started the investigation into crego and now look, he gets locked up. I think that is funny. Green has also been telling everyone that he talks with Spencer and gives him "information to expose people", another funny one. Who is next?

October 24, 2007 at 5:23 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It is very interesting indeed that Spencer hasn't said a word about John Green since his arrest. Very odd considering the fact that Spencer has written, what, 20 some print pieces on Mark Sereni, not including blogs? (he didn't even write anything close to that on Crego or Abrutyn) For the apparent purpose of getting Sereni fired. You know, the guy who did nothing wrong. The former prosecutor. The gifted trial attorney. The guy with the impeccable reputation. The guy who actually SAVED PDSD money over 17 years through his excellent representation (only to be fired by Gil's henchmen and replaced by a solicitor whose fees represent a 20% increase over Serenis)

Spencer has an odd sense of what is newsworthy. That he would repeatedly libel a straight arrow like Sereni (even mocking him for attending a meeting open to the public), and protect those are actually alleged to have committed crimes, speaks volumes about Gil Spencer. Not volumes worth reading, but volumes nonetheless.

October 24, 2007 at 7:51 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hello everyone, it's my first pay a quick visit at this site, and piece of writing is truly fruitful designed for me, keep up posting these articles.

my blog post ... Psn Code Generator

May 21, 2013 at 2:03 AM 
Blogger raybanoutlet001 said...

ugg outlet
ugg boots
true religion outlet
michael kors outlet
kate spade outlet
kate spade sale
cheap ugg boots
fitflops sale
michael kors bags
ugg boots

July 27, 2017 at 1:55 AM 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home