Actress Sharon Stone channels Bill Murray as Carl the Greenskeeper from "Caddyshack"
CARL: So I jump ship in Hong Kong and make my way over to Tibet, and I get on as a looper at a course over in the Himalayas. A looper, you know, a caddy, a looper, a jock. So, I tell them I'm a pro jock, and who do you think they give me? The Dalai Lama, himself. Twelfth son of the Lama. The flowing robes, the grace, bald... striking. So, I'm on the first tee with him. I give him the driver. He hauls off and whacks one -- big hitter, the Lama -- long, into a ten-thousand foot crevice, right at the base of this glacier. And do you know what the Lama says? Gunga galunga...gunga -- gunga galunga. So we finish the eighteenth and he's gonna stiff me. And I say, "Hey, Lama, hey, how about a little something, you know, for the effort, you know." And he says, "Oh, uh, there won't be any money, but when you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consiousness." So I got that goin' for me, which is nice.
SHARON: "All these earthquakes and stuff happened and I thought, "Is that karma?" When you are not nice, bad things happen to you. I'm not happy about how the Chinese are treating the Tibetans, I don't think anyone should be unkind to anyone else. They're not being very nice to the Dali Lama, who's a good friend of mine."
So she's got that going for her, which is nice.
Sharon Stone is a brainless floozy. There used to be buzz afloat that she was this really smart woman with some huge IQ. Turns out this was nothing more than planted PR. Anyone who has ever seen her interviewed or speak publicly knows this. Dumb as a stone...
ReplyDeleteRandal and Sharon Stone are both lacking in the intelligence department and spew their stupidity to all of us who just wish they would STFU. At least Stone has something going for her - she is hot. I suspect Randal is an bitter, overweight, old, white man.
ReplyDeleteI have to agree with you, Dumb Dingo, you indeed are a petty idiot with the intellect of a child.
ReplyDeleteWouldn’t you feel more comfortable on the Hanna Montana board, or something?
you can never go wrong with caddyshack references, even if Bill Murray is having divorce issues.
ReplyDeleteGreat comeback Randal! My guess is I have at least 1 more degree than you. Don't knock the intellect of a child, because rest assure, there are plenty of children with higher intellect than you!
ReplyDeleteDon’t be too quick to boast, Dumb Dingo. Dave Diano has already proven here many times over that all that Lib “education” does NOT necessarily translate to smarts.
ReplyDeleteWhy do you Lib dopes always feel the need to brag about you level of education anyway? Feeling a little insecure and the need to validate yourself and your childish Lib positions, are you? Lol…
And you're still a petty idiot with the intellect of a child.
ReplyDeleteNot sure what you mean by Lib education, it's just education, Lib/Repub has nothing to do with it. But that seems to be the way you are, labeling anything you don't agree with as Lib and assuming that anyone who disagrees with you is Lib. In my case you are wrong. Amusingly enough, you and I will likely be voting for the same candidate come November. What I can't stand are knuckleheads like yourself and Sharon Stone. You have more in common with her than you think Randal. Though on different sides you are both what I consider radicals. Radicals suck because they don't believe in compromise and alienate those who don't agree with them, hence they don't get a whole lot done. Don't assume so much Randal, try to be less of a tool, I understand this does not come easy to you.
ReplyDeleteDingo,
ReplyDeleteWhy does the number of degrees a person receives matter? Isn't it perfectly fine for someone to receive a BA or BS and have a successful life? Just because someone chose to be a psych major knowing they needed a masters or higher education to do anything with that undergrad degree does not make that person any smarter or more intelligent as you say.
Jonas,
ReplyDeleteYou are correct. Number of degrees doesn't matter, was just busting on Randal because it needs to be done.
Dingo,
ReplyDeleteThen bust on matters that actually are of importance or can be factually based. The fact you try to "bust on" Randal with inconsequential matters shows the lack of depth of your arguments. Wouldn't that then put you on the same playing field as Randal (coincidentally, the person you are attacking)?
He ain't got game for my field. It shows.
ReplyDeleteJonas,
ReplyDeleteI think I made my point with the 9:11 pm post.
Dingo:
ReplyDeleteI like dumb dingo, it has a nice ring to it. Dumb Dingo, there is a difference between being a liberal and being a conservative. Anyone who compromises their core beliefs is in trouble, because they stand for and believe in nothing. In this fight against liberalism, it is all about moving to the left, as the libs will never move to the right.
Randal knows the truth, so if you want to have an intellectual discussuion bring it on.
C. Scott Shields, Esquire
www.shieldsandhoppe.com
C. Scott,
ReplyDeleteYou spelled discussion wrong. Dingo is not dumb, he knows how to spell discussion! A few questions for you since you reference compromising core beliefs:
Ever taken on a case that you regretted? Ever represent a real dirtbag that you believed to be guilty of the crimes for which they were charged? Ever represent someone on a personal injury claim that you felt was just trying to take advantage of the system? I ask these questions in all seriousness because I am sure you have cases that come across your desk that are real dilemmas.
Dingoes can be petty nitpickers too.
ReplyDeleteBut Petty Nitpicker Dingo doesn't have the same ring to it as Dumb Dingo.
R,
ReplyDeleteIt was a joke, I know Shields knows how to spell discussion, I was pointing out his spelling since he was calling me dumb before asking him a serious question... nevermind, its not as funny when you have to explain it to a dumbass like you!
Classic petty Lib wiggle.
ReplyDeleteBrave Dingo:
ReplyDeleteWho are you? To answer your questions - (1) I do not regret taking any cases as everyone is entitled to a criminal defense. In fact, even if there is overwhelming evidence suggesting guilt, it is the burden of the govt to present evidence of that guilt by proof beyond a resonable doubt. There is a presumption of innocence until the govt meets its burden. (2) As for other types of cases, like personal injury, if I am approached by a potential who wants to fake injuries I don't take the case.
Hope that helps.
C. Scott Shields, Esquire
www.shieldsandhoppe.com
When can we start suing Libs for all the harm their backwards Libism has caused America? That would be a huge class and the burden of proof would be easy to achieve.
ReplyDeleteNo, I’m serious. If they can sue cig makers, gun makers and oil companies, then certainly we can sue the Libs for all the damage their product has done. Can we sue them for lying too?
You up for a beer and a sandwich tonight, Mr. S?