John Bolton predicts Israel will attack Iran's nuclear facilities between our presidential election and inaugeration.
Sounds like a plan.
He also predicts Arab leaderswill be secretly happy about it. Maybe. But most Muslims won't be.
If and when it happens, look for Iranian-funded terrorist violence to increase in Iraq. America's troops there will come under greater threat and some attacks. Fortunately, they can defend themselves pretty well.
The question is if Obama wins the presidency and things heat up will he turn tail and run out of Iraq or will he tough it out like McCain probably would. My guess is he'll bail. Just like Reagan did in Lebanon and Clinton did in Somalia.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteTranslation of Dave's post:
ReplyDelete"Blahblahblah the President of the United States is the enemy, not Iran blahweep I hate Bush weepweep he hurts my feelings!"
This is why Libs have been removed from all serious Iraq war conversation.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteUh, Dave, do you really expect anyone to take you guys at all seriously when you call for our President to be brought up on war crime charges for keeping us safe, just for your petty hurt feelings dislike of him? Seriously? Lol…
ReplyDeleteYou are evidence that armchair coward Libs like you are overly emotional to the point of being confused, backwards. You are blinded by your hatred of the man. I don’t think we should start making policy based on that sort of angry childish thinking. Such emotion has no place in policy making. This is why your kind has been largely dismissed. Don’t blame me; you did it to yourselves.
But don’t feel too bad, you've got company. We shouldn’t ask angry and weepy third grade girls what they think we should do about Iraq either.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDave
ReplyDeleteCome on Dave. Why let history and facts stand in the way of foreign poilcy.
I still cant beleive the Randals of this world feel safer with the bulk of our troops bogged down in a country that had nothing to do with attacking the U.S. Where's the logic? But then, why let logic stand in the way of foreign policy?
Don't cry, Dave, it'll be all ok when mean old Bush is out of office.
ReplyDeleteAnd Bob should just write "me too!" after Dishonest Dave's posts and be done with it.
Bob sounds like Dave Diano's Ditto Head. I will stick with Rush, as he is way smarter than any liberal weenie out there.
ReplyDeleteAlso, there is great benefit and security for our nation being in the Middle East. The world (those people that hate us) is scared to death of our President, as they should be. The proof is that the rogue nations have stood down.
So what happens if Hussein is elected? Hum, well we know he has NO experience, and that he is a poor public speaker when not in front of a teleprompter (worse than the President), and that he bowled a 37 when campaigning with Casey. What does that mean, he is a loser, and he has no strength, either physical or mental.
This nation is in trouble.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteObama has expertly managed and won a campaign
ReplyDeleteUntrue. His handlers have done this.
We have seen what a shallow fumbling dope B. Hussein Osama really is whenever he goes off script.
Point for Mr. S.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteC. Scott Shields Esq. & R,
ReplyDeleteMr. Esq. (that Esq. thing sounds so gay.), Your comment "Bob sounds like Dave Diano's Ditto Head. I will stick with Rush, as he is way smarter than any liberal weenie out there." Well C., among other things, I see you are also an authority on "Weenies". How interesting. Your comment "he is a poor public speaker when not in front of a teleprompter" Poor public speaker? The guy that was heralded for delivering a splended keynote address at the 2004 convention? And if you think he's lost without a teleprompter, you obviously haven't seen him interviewed. You want to talk about poor speaking ability? Look at W., and McCain. Oh, and by the way Mr. Esq. Are you pro Christ or Pro Gun? Make up your mind. You obviously think the rest of the world should be controled by intimidation and fear of violence from the U.S. Is that Christlike Mr.Shields Esq.? What king of assault weapon would Jesus own? If I'm a Dave ditto head, then you come across as a dumbded down version of R., who's kind of a dumbded down version of Jason. Randal - Part of being president involves surrounding yourself with the right people and delegating authority. Seems to me like Obama is off to a good start.
Sure, Dave, every campaign is managed by someone other that the candidate themselves. But your assertion that B. Hussein Obama “expertly managed and won a campaign” as if he did this all on his own was crap, so I called you on it, is all. No biggie. And he does suck speaking off the cuff. Only dopes believe he’s this great orator. To simply say otherwise is, well, to simply say otherwise.
ReplyDeleteAnd I though you guys hated the Electoral College, DD?? What happened to that? Oh, that’s right, after weeping about it endlessly when you lost, hypocrites like you guys see nothing wrong with it so long as it’s serving your wants at the moment.
Man, Boring Bob sure is, well, boring. And he’s no mental giant either. I’m telling you, BB, you really should try just saying “Me too!” after each of Dave’s posts and leave it at that.
R
ReplyDeleteStill calling names like a 12 year old. But then what would one expect from someone who claims to want to spit in the face of a mother who lost her son in Iraq.
Yoy still crying about that? [hands BB a tissue]
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYour man B. Hussein Osama is much more likely to protect his Muslim brotha, Obama bin Laden, than “defeat” him.
ReplyDeleteNo, most Dems weep about the EC because their simple minds fail to understand it and the Lib in them wants to change the rules mid game when they fail to serve their wants. This is the child like mentality of your base. And they are hypocrites too, because should the EC serve them well this time, you can bet that we won’t hear a weeping peep out of them about it. (Nor will we hear any of the hollow calls for “checks and balances!” should the filthy Donkeys take the WH and both chambers of Congress.)
LibDems have really dumbed down our political system with all that “get everyone involved” stuff. “Vote or die!”… Now that’s deep. Lol…
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteGee. I really have to hand it all of you here. Lib this and Con that, the only thing I would like to ask you is:
ReplyDeleteOut of the two so called "Candidates", which one will reinstate the draft? All of us remember Vietnam, right? Were they over there protecting our freedoms?
Ask my brother in law or the other tens of thousands of Vets.
Just playing along with the cheap Lib games, is all, DD.
ReplyDeleteHypocrite you seems to think that the LibDems should be free to pull any underhanded crap while you try to hold the Right to higher standards. Kinda like the Racial Double Standard you promote.
Man, you must really be messing up your kids with their dad being so dishonest about everything. Do you actively teach them to be liars and against fair play, or do you just lead by example, DD?
No one has mentioned it but the title of this thread is great. Gil gives good headline.
ReplyDelete