Tuesday, September 30, 2008
posted by Spencerblog at
I guess with Manion, along with Williams as well as the fact that McCain has kids in the service and Palin’s son is due in Iraq, the childish petty partisan Michael Moore Standard of the LibDems has been blown out of the water. See, people with kids in the military –even with kids killed- can still support their country and do what’s right with the war. They’re not all a bunch of Sheehans. Maybe more people with kids in the military should support their mission rather than letting their hurt feelings cause them to try and undermine them, eh BB?
R,In case you haven't noticed many of your comments containing either personal insults or terms like "scumbag" and "filthy LibDems" have been rejected. Snarkiness is welcome at Spencerblog. Mindless, juvenile and personal insults are not. Diano is gone. And you'll be next if you don't watch it.
are you saying that Michael Chitwood's statements wouldn't make it through the almighty SpencerFilter?
Fair question. It's news when a public figure uses salty language or puts it on a T-shirt. But the Almighty SpencerFilter will not allow him to post such comments here.Thank you for asking.End of line.
Nice, Gil picked up on my reference! This calls for a YouTube Video! TRON Lightbike Scene
So are you going to join the Commie LibDems like affirmative action B. Hussein in banning free speech with his gangland tactics? Michelle Malkin called him out on it: More Obama gangland tactics: Signs banned at Virginia rally todayWe can't let the Sheehans take over and cut-and-run us out of Iraq just because their feelings are hurt by losing their kids. They are dishonoring those kids with their childish petty weepy LibDem hippie protests instead of supporting their country and doing what’s right with the war.If you dared to ban me those traitor LibDems would take over. Such wielding of political correctness as a silencing weapon, as DDD tried to do, is classic Dishonest Modern Liberalism.
randal - banning free speech or censoring overly-offensive statements to keep the board clean? I disagree with the comment moderation and will continue to do so as long as its on, but I do understand why Gil's removing certain posts. Is this why we haven't seen Mayor C. Scott on the board in awhile?
That wasn’t me, S. I don't even know how to post a link like that here. But the Imposter R makes some good points! Lol… Nearly every single message board I’ve been on sooner or later some cowardly Lib whose feelings I have hurt takes to impersonating me. They’re quite predictable, them petty Libs. But, ‘the sincerest form of flattery’ and all that… It’s good to know I make such an impression on their little lives. There’s no free speech issue, S. This is Gil’s private board and as such he can do as he pleases. He only has to answer to his boss and Blog Board Democracy in that should he become too oppressive in censoring this place –as he’s shown signs of already- then he risks driving away posters and ending up posting by himself. I’ve seen just that happen a hundred times.
OK. Why would anyone want to pretend to be Randal!
bob, I think someone read Gil's warning to randal earlier in the week, and knowing that he doesn't use a blogger ID, can assume his identity by entering 'randal' or 'r' in the ID box while commenting. all with the hopes of removing randal permanently. It's up to r to do something about it.
Steve - I'd hate to see that happen. That would be a big loss.
The truth is, I really like Randal. He's very smart and insightful. He always has a good way of looking at things and explaining them. I sometimes wish I were more like him.
Gil - OK. That last post left me laughing, but again, it wasn't me.
It wasn't me, either. Sounds like r trying to get your goat (or you were blogging after being hit with a blunt object).
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Create a Link
View my complete profile
Subscribe toPosts [Atom]