The First Lady is a political figure in her own right, with her own big government agenda. She is promoting government intrusion into our eating and parenting choices. She also spends ridiculous amounts of our money on extravagant vacations.
It's the height of hypocrisy (note correct spelling) for someone with her ample backside to be telling anyone how to eat or to exercise more. That hypocrisy extends to her selection of her crony as Surgeon General, a woman who is decidedly obese.
Moochelle is fair game for all manner of public comment, whether you like it or not.
jake - All first ladies travel at an expense to tax payers. It's accepted. The fact that you have, in the past, exagerated the costs of these trips is just more proof of your inability to be honest. And most first ladies find a cause to work for. Johnsons wife had beautify America, Nancy Reagan had her anti drug campaign, Laura Bush had literacy, etc. I'll tell you what big man. Post a picture of your wife so we can see how she measures up to Michelle Obama.
Trust me, big man, Mrs Jake could resolve your latent manhood issues a lot better than Mrs Barack.
Notice you conveniently left out Hillary, who was routinely criticized for her meddling in policy matters, and for her appearance. Didn't quite fit your self-righteous tantrum, did it?
And let's not forget how you liberal defenders of womanly virtue went ballistic over Nancy Reagan's china, and it didn't even come from taxpayers dollars.
Don't you ever get tired of being such a partisan fraud?
Trust you? Why would I trust someone who constanty lies and misrepresents? Take responsibility for your statements jake. They were rude and obnoxious. Would you want someone to talk about your wife like that? Are these your Christian values?
Being told to act like a Christian by an atheist is like being told to work harder by a public sector union employee. Captain Hindsight needs to check his credibility before he pleads for civility.
Just got an email from Michelle telling me she "loves me back". For a mere $3 dollars we have a chance to go out to dinner. Apparently, Bob has failed to clear his hissy fit with Michelle.
I never remember people saying things like this about Nancy Reagan, Betty Ford or Laura Bush. It's just another indication of the moral deterioration of the right.
Danny - I said something about Nancy Reagan reading horoscopes? I was critical of Barbara Bush? Really? Maybe you've missed the point here. My criticism was of jake. Would you want anyone saying that kind of stuff about your wife? And BTW, Nancy Reagan really did do the horoscope thing. That's one of the reasons that Donald Regan left. Its no secret. I'm not really sure why you would even try to make that comparison. Are you drinking?
BTW Danny - I voted for Bush Sr. & if I remember right Barbara was pretty well liked. You're the first person I've heard of mention anything about her looks.
It's amazing how Bob can change his story in a mere 5 and 1/2 hours. And then has the temerity to question Danny's sobriety?
This morning it was a blanket indictment of conservatives, "It's just another indication of the moral deterioration of the right."
This afternoon he retreats to the more modest indictment of racist, unmanly, un-Christian, rude and obnoxious me.
But by all means we must have civility. Just like Michelle's oversized butt and policies for an intrusive nanny state, it all comes back to "do as I say, not as I do."
jake - Well, you know, your defense of Paterno who could have done more to stop Sandusky, your defense of McQueary for walking away from a child being raped, your childish enjoyment over the South Park pedophile episode, your ficticious rant calling a black man Mandingo, and now your obnoxious comments about Michelle Obama. Like I said jake. You're a class act.
Bob: You mention that you don't remember "people saying things like this about Nancy Reagan, Betty Ford or Laura Bush." Maybe that is because they only needed one chair. Then after further posts you find it necessary to comment on Jake's defense of Mr. Paterno. What in the hell does that have to do with the comments that preceded? Typical Bob-Liberal speak of: change-the-subject-because-I-won't-let-you-deny-me-as-being-the-know-all. I for one hope, Bob, that you'll let Jake have the last word for once and not further embarrass yourself.
Charlie Two Times - Never give jake the last word? See the post "Dems war on reason" Not staying on subject? See the post "Media Whore" where I asked you to remain on subject. It's all archived. You want to join jake in poking fun at Michelle? Post a picture of your old lady Chuck.
Charlie Two Times - I owe you an apology. I was wrong. I just checked "Dems war on reason" and jake didn't have the last word. YOU DID! You were saying?
30 Comments:
Can we put that windmill on top of a car? Will there still be room for the dog?
backup power for the teleprompters should be solar. i'd like to see what he would do on an overcast day!
We need to be building nuke plants!!
It is by far the cleanest energy we have available today!
You could harvest the algae that grows on the north side of Michelle's protruding posterior.
You're a real class act jake.
Yeah, like I care what's said by a guy who thinks the Post Office is well-run.
What kind of a man makes fun of another man's wife? Yea. Now I'm questioning your manhood Jake.
The First Lady is a political figure in her own right, with her own big government agenda. She is promoting government intrusion into our eating and parenting choices. She also spends ridiculous amounts of our money on extravagant vacations.
It's the height of hypocrisy (note correct spelling) for someone with her ample backside to be telling anyone how to eat or to exercise more. That hypocrisy extends to her selection of her crony as Surgeon General, a woman who is decidedly obese.
Moochelle is fair game for all manner of public comment, whether you like it or not.
You're a real class act, Bob.
This comment has been removed by the author.
jake - All first ladies travel at an expense to tax payers. It's accepted. The fact that you have, in the past, exagerated the costs of these trips is just more proof of your inability to be honest. And most first ladies find a cause to work for. Johnsons wife had beautify America, Nancy Reagan had her anti drug campaign, Laura Bush had literacy, etc. I'll tell you what big man. Post a picture of your wife so we can see how she measures up to Michelle Obama.
Trust me, big man, Mrs Jake could resolve your latent manhood issues a lot better than Mrs Barack.
Notice you conveniently left out Hillary, who was routinely criticized for her meddling in policy matters, and for her appearance. Didn't quite fit your self-righteous tantrum, did it?
And let's not forget how you liberal defenders of womanly virtue went ballistic over Nancy Reagan's china, and it didn't even come from taxpayers dollars.
Don't you ever get tired of being such a partisan fraud?
Trust you? Why would I trust someone who constanty lies and misrepresents? Take responsibility for your statements jake. They were rude and obnoxious. Would you want someone to talk about your wife like that? Are these your Christian values?
Being told to act like a Christian by an atheist is like being told to work harder by a public sector union employee.
Captain Hindsight needs to check his credibility before he pleads for civility.
This comment has been removed by the author.
jake - I'm not an Atheist. And you are living proof that not all Christians are moral people.
Just got an email from Michelle telling me she "loves me back". For a mere $3 dollars we have a chance to go out to dinner.
Apparently, Bob has failed to clear his hissy fit with Michelle.
C'mon jake. Gil's given you posting rights. You going to post a picture of Mrs. jake so we can see how she measures up to Michelle?
When you have that $3.00 dinner with Michelle, Jake, please remember to say to the hostess: "Table for two but we'll need three chairs, please."
I never remember people saying things like this about Nancy Reagan, Betty Ford or Laura Bush. It's just another indication of the moral deterioration of the right.
A liberal preaching about morals is like Sandra Fluke preaching about abstinence.
Bob, Nancy Reagan and horoscopes? You don't remember that?
Barbara Bush was hammered for her older woman look.
You have a serious selective memory disorder!
And jake? "A liberal preaching about morals is like Sandra Fluke preaching about abstinence."
Great one!!!! You win!!!
Danny - I said something about Nancy Reagan reading horoscopes? I was critical of Barbara Bush? Really? Maybe you've missed the point here. My criticism was of jake. Would you want anyone saying that kind of stuff about your wife? And BTW, Nancy Reagan really did do the horoscope thing. That's one of the reasons that Donald Regan left. Its no secret. I'm not really sure why you would even try to make that comparison. Are you drinking?
BTW Danny - I voted for Bush Sr. & if I remember right Barbara was pretty well liked. You're the first person I've heard of mention anything about her looks.
It's amazing how Bob can change his story in a mere 5 and 1/2 hours. And then has the temerity to question Danny's sobriety?
This morning it was a blanket indictment of conservatives, "It's just another indication of the moral deterioration of the right."
This afternoon he retreats to the more modest indictment of racist, unmanly, un-Christian, rude and obnoxious me.
But by all means we must have civility. Just like Michelle's oversized butt and policies for an intrusive nanny state, it all comes back to "do as I say, not as I do."
This comment has been removed by the author.
jake - Well, you know, your defense of Paterno who could have done more to stop Sandusky, your defense of McQueary for walking away from a child being raped, your childish enjoyment over the South Park pedophile episode, your ficticious rant calling a black man Mandingo, and now your obnoxious comments about Michelle Obama. Like I said jake. You're a class act.
Bob: You mention that you don't remember "people saying things like this about Nancy Reagan, Betty Ford or Laura Bush." Maybe that is because they only needed one chair. Then after further posts you find it necessary to comment on Jake's defense of Mr. Paterno. What in the hell does that have to do with the comments that preceded? Typical Bob-Liberal speak of: change-the-subject-because-I-won't-let-you-deny-me-as-being-the-know-all. I for one hope, Bob, that you'll let Jake have the last word for once and not further embarrass yourself.
Charlie Two Times - Never give jake the last word? See the post "Dems war on reason" Not staying on subject? See the post "Media Whore" where I asked you to remain on subject. It's all archived. You want to join jake in poking fun at Michelle? Post a picture of your old lady Chuck.
Charlie Two Times - I owe you an apology. I was wrong. I just checked "Dems war on reason" and jake didn't have the last word. YOU DID! You were saying?
CharlieSix, I just checked it out. he's right. You did get the last word, and he did ask you to stay on topic.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home