Why did the prez push such a complicated, regressive and divisive law? Ego!
Considering the ACA's glaring -- and predictable -- economic and political shortcomings, why did Obama make it his first-term centerpiece? The answer seems to be his obsession with securing his legacy as the president who achieved the liberal grail of universal coverage. In his book "The Escape Artists: How Obama's Team Fumbled the Recovery," Noam Scheiber recounts a telling incident. Obama's advisers tell him he can be known for preventing a second Great Depression. "That's not enough for me," Obama replies.
The ACA is Obama's ego trip, but as a path to presidential greatness, it may disappoint no matter how the court decides. Lyndon's Johnson's creation of Medicare and Medicaid was larger, and he isn't deemed great. And then, unlike now, government seemed capable of paying for bigger programs.
Sammuelson rightly points out that unless the Supreme Court rules 7-2 or better one way or another (and it won't), partisans from either side will attack the verdict. He's quite right.
I am confidently predicting a 5-4 vote. Bold prediction, isn't it?
ReplyDeleteDon't be too sure Steve. Scalia might go the other way, making it 6-3 for the law. Then again Kennedy might fake left and go right. One thing you can bet on. If it is declared unconstitutional, it will be by a vote of 5-4. The liberals on the court are reliably ideologic.
ReplyDeleteMy own prediction is that the law will be upheld.
ReplyDeleteI tend to agree. Conservative justices, by nature, will be reluctant to interfere in the legislative process.
ReplyDeleteI'm in agreement with Borg of you. Don't like the potential precedent it will set.
ReplyDeleteUmm, "both" (iPhone...)
DeleteActually, Borg might be right.
ReplyDelete"Resistance is futile, you will be assimilated."