More on Prof. Elizabeth Warren's
color scheme from the Editors at NRO:
Set aside, for a moment, the mere fact of Elizabeth Warren’s undocumented claims of Cherokee heritage, such sentences as “My pawpaw had high cheekbones, like all the Indians do,” the hokey Pow Wow Chow cookbook with recipes from Le Pavillon (which was located in the famous Cherokee territory of Fifth Avenue, across from the St. Regis Hotel — happy hunting grounds, indeed), and listing herself as a member of a minority group in the Harvard directory. Forget all of that for a moment and consider that Harvard Law School advertised Elizabeth Warren — blond-haired, blue-eyed, pale to the point of translucence — as its “first woman of color” enjoying tenure. It would later cite her presence on the faculty as evidence of its commitment to “diversity.” And she allowed it.
One would think that Harvard’s law school and one of its most prominent professors might have some interest in the question of evidence. (They still teach the rules of evidence at Harvard Law.) Like most Indian tribes, the Cherokee are fairly picky about who gets to call himself a Cherokee, and, unlike Harvard, they demand documentation. Indeed, it is a commentary on our times that “Cherokee genealogist” describes an occupational specialization, and a prominent Cherokee genealogist has reiterated that Ms. Warren has no documentable claim to Cherokee ancestry. This is not unusual: So common are false claims of Cherokee ancestry that among genealogists “My grandmother was a Cherokee princess” is a punch line. But the typical third-grader uttering this sentence is not running for the U.S. Senate nor contributing to the alleged “diversity” of Harvard Law.
So while the situation is amusing, it is not a joke — it is the poison fruit of the Left’s long history of racial exploitation reaching its ripeness.
Read it all. The Diversity Chickens are coming home to roost.
"....the poison fruit of the Left’s long history of racial exploitation reaching its ripeness."
ReplyDeleteBeautifully stated!!
There are no righty crooks
ReplyDeleteYou're right on, Rdub. No righty crooks evident from this post or the content therein included. Keep trying and maybe you'll someday make sense.
ReplyDeleteNo one said there were no right wing crooks. This was about racial exploitation. Rdub? Read much?
ReplyDeleteDanny: Obviously Rdub doesn't have the time to read the full post on "The Redskin Fraud". That's perhaps being generous. Perhaps Rdub did read the full post and link related thereto and he/she doesn't comprehend it. Just gonna have that sometimes.
ReplyDelete