Media luminaries bid a fond farewell to Gore Vidal. Andrew Ferguson
calls them on it.
The most puzzling thing about the career of Gore Vidal, who went toes-up last week at 86, was the reverence in which he was held by people who might have known better. . . .
For decades Vidal had said that Franklin Roosevelt knew in advance of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and let the slaughter come anyway, and when 9/11 gave him the chance to make the same slander against another president, he went even further and speculated that George Bush had colluded with his vice president to encourage the terrorist attacks. At his death a critic at the Washington Post summarized the Vidalian view with an uncommon mildness: "He took an acerbic view of American leadership."
The man must have felt bulletproof. With implausible romances like Lincoln and Burr he filled more readers' heads with more historical crapola than anyone since Parson Weems. ("So powerful as to compel awe," said Harold Bloom of Vidal's make-believe histories.)
He thought the Bilderbergers and members of the Bohemian Grove controlled world finance. ("He is a treasure of state," said R.W.B. Lewis.) He befriended Timothy McVeigh and spoke warmly of him. ("Vidal did not lightly suffer fools," said the obit writer in the New York Times.) He dished out anti-Semitism in a dozen different venues with imperturbable serenity. ("Both by temperament and by birth he was an aristocrat," said the Times.) He called William F. Buckley a crypto-Nazi. ("Vidal was known for his . . . scathing wit," said Diane Sawyer on ABC.) He wanted to try Henry Kissinger for war crimes and suggested that John McCain had invented tales of his torture at the hands of the Vietnamese. ("A savvy analyst and glorious gadfly on the national conscience," said the L.A. Times.) . . .
I was interested in Diane Sawyer's brief obituary on her ABC evening news show. It centered on the notorious confrontation (on ABC TV) between Vidal and Buckley in 1968, in which Buckley countered Vidal's accusation of Nazism with the vigorous insight that Vidal was "queer"—not high on the list of Buckley's scathing witticisms either. In recalling the event, Sawyer identified Vidal as the "celebrity novelist," while taking special care to tag Buckley as the "arch-conservative."
Why arch? The two tags make for a curious imbalance. For 50 years Buckley's views were safely on the rightward edge of the American popular consensus; Vidal's were shared by a tiny minority—cranks and ignoramuses in Hollywood, Manhattan, Northwest Washington, D.C., various college towns, and Ruby Ridge, Idaho. Yet it is Buckley who earns the ideological intensifier "arch."
Commenting on Gore Vidal as if he was worthy of commentary is what people like Diane Sawyer get paid to do. But it is also what makes them feel 'connected' to the elete. The world is a better place now that Vidal is gone. He is typical of those who suck out of our free society everything they can without giving back anything of lasting meaning...
ReplyDeleteP.S. Let us not forget that Diane Sawyer is a soul-mate of Vidal as one of those who suck out of our society what makes them feel important while at the same time getting very wealthy...
ReplyDeleteA BBC TV documentary - "Sacrifice at Pearl Harbor" - makes a very powerful case of prior knowledge about Pearl Harbor against FDR and the Washington power brokers. What is presented in that video is quite believable and well supported by statements of those who were directly involved in espionage activities and wire tapping of the Japanese embassy.
ReplyDeleteAs far as the attacks on 9/11 in Manhattan, there are too many unanswered questions about the obvious controlled demolition of three buildings, although only two were hit by aircraft. Perhaps of even greater consternation is the completely bogus reporting of what actually slammed into the Pentagon on that day. It most certainly wasn't an aircraft.
Nine-eleven was a perfect example of what is known in some circles as "game theory war planning." And, to the detriment of humanity, it has worked like a charm.
A large sized battery will not fit your car tray and there is no use of purchasing a battery which is just too short for your car tray. Though, it was not pending in the nineteenth century that electrical energy was yoked to generate light. With many years, human development hormone decreases and leads to the look of all indicators of growing old this kind of as wrinkles, increased stomach fat, decreased lean muscle and lowered libido.
ReplyDelete