According to an affidavit of probable cause, the victim wanted a tattoo on her chest. Hampton made sexual advances toward the girl, then took her into the bathroom and allegedly forced her to perform a sexual act, the affidavit said.Forced? If I have this straight, the girl wanted a tattoo. Hampton offered to oblige in exchange for a sexual favor. He got the favor and she got the tattoo. If she hadn't been 15, nobody would've said boo.
Afterward, the girl got a tattoo on her chest, requiring her to expose her breast.
Under the negotiated plea worked out by Assistant District Attorney Jeffrey Boogay and defense counsel Paul DiMaio, the corruption of minors charge was downgraded from a felony to a misdemeanor.
I'm guessing, a parent saw the tattoo and freaked out, demanding to know who did it and how much the girl had to pay for it. That's when the ink hit the fan.
Sounds like justice was, more or less, done.
Assuming the parents of this girl also live in Upper Darby, what is the under over on tattoos that each parent possesses?
ReplyDeleteI'll set the opening line at four.
Hi.
ReplyDeleteWould you mind letting me know which web host you're using? I've loaded your blog in 3 different
browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot faster then most.
Can you suggest a good internet hosting provider at a fair price?
Thank you, I appreciate it!
Also visit my website :: Gas Mileage
Hi there!
ReplyDeleteThis post could not be written any better! Reading this post reminds me of my good old room mate!
He always kept chatting about this. I will forward this article to him.
Pretty sure he will have a good read. Thanks for sharing!
Here is my web page - Shooting Games
Hello.
ReplyDeleteI particularly love your new views on Blogger: Spencerblog and
will be back again...
Thank you...
my blog post Desktop Gadgets