Tuesday, September 11, 2007

A Slimey New Low

A pretty fair assessment of how low the Democrats have sunk and what that portends.

Money quote:

"Betrayal," as every military officer knows, is a word that through the history of their profession bears the stain of acts that are both dishonorable and unforgivable. That is to say, MoveOn.org didn't stumble upon this word; it was chosen with specific intent, to convey the most serious accusation possible against General Petraeus, that his word is false, that he is a liar and that he is willing to betray his country. The next and obvious word to which this equation with betrayal leads is treason. That it is merely insinuated makes it worse."

Disgraceful.

13 Comments:

Blogger David Diano said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

September 11, 2007 at 10:23 AM 
Blogger Spencerblog said...

Like I said, disgraceful.

And becoming typically so.

September 11, 2007 at 10:51 AM 
Anonymous Randal said...

Libs are like angry children. When they get to acting out they point their fingers and scream that their opponent is guilty of what they are. It’s the political equivalent of “I know you are but what am I?”

Everyone knows that these radical Lib anti-war groups are the traitors to their country in all this. Simply accusing the other side of this changes not this truth.
Heck, they sound just like Osama when they really get on a roll!

September 11, 2007 at 11:36 AM 
Blogger David Diano said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

September 11, 2007 at 12:11 PM 
Anonymous Randal said...

Nice wiggling.
Give it up, Dave. This thread is not about the content or motivations of Petraeus’ report but about the despicable preemptive attack on him by his treasonous fellow Americans.

Yeah, they ran it before they even heard what his report contained. What's that tell us about their level of blind oposition?

September 11, 2007 at 12:48 PM 
Blogger David Diano said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

September 11, 2007 at 2:22 PM 
Anonymous Randal said...

To pretend that LibDems hadn’t decided months ago that they would oppose it is ridiculous.

September 11, 2007 at 2:49 PM 
Blogger David Diano said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

September 11, 2007 at 4:41 PM 
Blogger David Diano said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

September 11, 2007 at 4:45 PM 
Anonymous Randal said...

You’re grasping, Davy.
What does any of that have to do with the fact that every LibDem decided months ago that they were going to blindly oppose the report no matter what it said because they hate Bush and want to again use the war for votes this election?

September 11, 2007 at 5:51 PM 
Blogger David Diano said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

September 11, 2007 at 11:40 PM 
Anonymous Randal said...

Huh? Have you been drinking tonight, Dave? I’ve already won this one.

The filthy LibDems were against it even before they were against it. And that’s that.

September 12, 2007 at 1:28 AM 
Blogger David Diano said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

September 12, 2007 at 3:07 PM 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home