Monday, March 31, 2008

The Mumia Circus Continues

An appeals court claims the death penalty phase of Mumia Abul Jamal's trial was flawed.

But it's what his lawyer said that jumps out at me:

"I've never seen a case as permeated and riddled with racism as this one," Robert R. Bryan said. "I want a new trial, and I want him free. His conviction was a travesty of justice."

The travesty here is that murder of Officer Daniel Faulkner has become such a cause celebre for so many left-wing conspiracy kooks, fruitcakes and lawyers.

There are examples of real judicial travesties in American history. The Mumia case is NOT one of them. And yet it is clung to by anti-American and anti-Death penalty zealots around the world.

Nothing in the judges' ruling, however, suggests the court believes that an innocent man was convicted of a crime he didn't commit.

There is a reason for this: No reasonably sane person can believe, based on the evidence, that Mumia didn't murder Daniel Faulkner. The travesty here is a court system that permits its own abuse.


Blogger steve mcdonald said...

This is pathetic and saddening.

I said it years ago and I'll say it again, Justice will never be served for Officer Faulkner.

March 31, 2008 at 8:38 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mumia did it and anyone who thinks he didn't do it is out of touch with reality. He and his supporters have spent 25 years railing against his "unfair" and "racist" trial. Mumia basically wanted the trial to be a political trial and wanted to run from the facts and the evidence. He disrupted the trial, prevented his own lawyer, Tony Jackson (who was black) from effectively defending him from the death penalty or conviction, and now he has become a celebrity in certain circles of demented losers.

March 31, 2008 at 11:04 AM 
Anonymous randal said...

Keep in mind that Mumia’s defenders –all Leftist Libs- are also the very same people who see the death penalty for scum of the earth as somehow worse than the “choice/right” to murder unborn innocent babies… and protest the war… and blame Bush for everything under the sun… spout Hate America First anti-Americanism… endeavore to replace God in schools with Gay… attend Chicago’s Black Militant Trinity Church and want to elect a black militant candidate Obama as our next president…

Why anyone listens to Lib idiots anymore at all is beyond me.
Cue Apologist Dave to show up and tell us how the ‘evil white racist system railroaded poor victim Mumia’. Lol… Let’s hear it, Dave. I could use a good laugh!
Hey, maybe you think Mumia Abu Jamal should be our next president??!! I say we make him the Faulkner widow's slave.

March 31, 2008 at 11:19 AM 
Blogger Pro Christ Pro Gun said...

Liberals will do or say anything to distort what happened in that case. There is a man who lives in my community who wrote a letter to the editor of the Delcotimes and stated somthing to the effect that Mumia deserves a new trial because of the appearance that the original trial looked bad from a racial standpoint.

It is difficult to comprehend why these apologists are coming to the cold blooded murderers aid. However, it is more about pushing an agenda than it is about seeking the truth. Libs don't let facts get in the way of the agenda.

If the libs would only invest the same energy in combating the american holocaust of abortion on demand.

It really is sick.

March 31, 2008 at 12:04 PM 
Blogger David Diano said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

March 31, 2008 at 12:09 PM 
Anonymous r said...

However, it is more about pushing an agenda than it is about seeking the truth. Libs don't let facts get in the way of the agenda.

Always. And this is exactly why we should ignore and dismiss the Lib Liars, no matter the topic.

There is no question that what I say is true, Dave. It is your whacko Lib buddies and only your whacko Lib buddies that defend guilty scumbags like Mumia. Period. This is just another perfect example of backward Liberal misplaced sympathies.

Q: What’s the difference between Black Panther Mumia Abu Jamal and Black Panther-endorsed Barrack Hussein Obama?

A: One lives in Chicago.

Oh, and one killed a white cop …while apologist Libs agree with black militants that the other should be our next president only because he is black.

March 31, 2008 at 12:41 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

David: if you are interested in learning more, go to, Maureen Faulkner' website. It debunks a lot of myths about the Mumia trial in a very just-the-facts manner. For instance, Mumia's Jury started out with three blacks, and one was stricken for violating the sequestration Order, which make Mumia's lawyer (who was black) happy because she was showing hostility toward Mumia with facial expressions, etc.

In terms of people changing testimony, not really. There were four eyewitnesses for the prosecution. The defense dug up, years later, three other eyewitnesses, one of whom they conceeded was not credible and another who actually confirmed the prosecution's story!

Look at the facts and you'll see that he's clearly guilty. Never mind that Mumia's gun was clearly the instrument of Daniel Faulkner's death and that he had it with him at the scene. The forensice evidence alone could have convicted Mumia.

March 31, 2008 at 12:47 PM 
Anonymous r said...

Facts no longer matter in this case, friend.
This entire episode has been a twisting distortion of our justice system. His supporters –outside agitators- have turned it into a game. They care nothing about the truth.
It is well past time to tell the apologists and racial rabble rousers to STFU and just kill this scumbag and let the black riots begin.

March 31, 2008 at 12:58 PM 
Blogger steve mcdonald said...

umm, I'm going to wash my hands of those slavery and gay remarks. Count me out of that group, Gil.

I guess I tend to be a more moderate conservative, rather than the extreme right...

I take offense when I hear that a College wants Mumia to tape a commencement address, or When a France names a street after him, or when he hosts radio shows or when celebrities line up backing him (that's as bad as Alycia Lane suing the NYPD for her pathetic acts last year).

The man's clearly guilty, and, at the very least, he should never have the opportunity to walk amongst us ever again.

March 31, 2008 at 1:00 PM 
Blogger steve mcdonald said...

Gil, where's you post about opening day taking place this afternoon? We need to post our liberal/conservative predictions!!!


March 31, 2008 at 1:59 PM 
Blogger David Diano said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

March 31, 2008 at 2:03 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The only way to be sure about anything related to mumia, is to execute him. That way we will be sure that he is finally dead.

March 31, 2008 at 2:37 PM 
Anonymous randal said...

Man, Apologist Lib Dave is pulling it all out here.

Notice how even though Apologist Dave declares the guy guilty, he still goes on to indict whites and the system as being inherently unable to render justice fairly.
That White Guilt sure makes Libs say silly stuff.

And it is an old Lib tactic to cite the very questionable and often ridiculous charges raised by his supporters just for the appearance of validity doing so offers. Most have been laughed out of court, or should have been.
And Dave did it again with his backhanded implication of the police while offering qualifiers to make his ungrounded libel appear to be a fair or objective assessment. There is nothing fair or objective about Dave. -Predictable is more accurate.

Ignore the Daves. There is no doubt, reasonable or otherwise, as to Mumia’s guilt or that he received a fair trial. Time to move on to the lynching… Oops, I mean, implementing the civilized death penalty.

March 31, 2008 at 2:54 PM 
Blogger David Diano said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

March 31, 2008 at 7:18 PM 
Anonymous r said...

I well understand that apologists like you have attempted create a “complex issue” where none exists. You have demonstrated no motivation for the police nor the evil white system to implicate or railroad this guilty thug. While every word you have typed comes from your apologist place and as such is suspect.
And again with the insipid implication of the police when you have nothing to back your claim.
Sometimes blackie is just guilty, Dave.

March 31, 2008 at 8:19 PM 
Blogger David Diano said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

March 31, 2008 at 10:12 PM 
Anonymous r said...

Philly cops of that era damaged the reputation of good cops everywhere.

Wow. If I said that about blacks you'd be all over me.
I guess profiling bias is selective too, eh Dave.
And still nothing close to proof that the cops in this case did anything wrong. Just the suggestion of it... eh Dave.

March 31, 2008 at 11:15 PM 
Blogger David Diano said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

April 1, 2008 at 2:47 AM 
Anonymous r said...

I'm all for it. We need more police beating the crap out of criminal scumbags on the scene. We've let Libs and their pro-criminal misplaced sympathies tie cops' hands with all this rediculous PC and kid gloveing that just makes it harder for them to do their jobs while benefitting the deserving scumbags.

Philly criminal blacks have damaged the reputation of good blacks everywhere.

April 1, 2008 at 10:57 AM 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home