Monday, June 23, 2008

Doomed to Repeat It?

On Iraq, Obama is living in the past. So are a lot of his supporters.


Anonymous r said...

Oh yeah. Many of Obama's supporters are living in the past alright... like the past of the civil rights movement. That's not very "progressive". Time to evolve.

Here, B. Hussein Obama and his LibDems buds seem to long for the days when the Iraq war was going badly. You can just envision them in a Donkey strategy room bemoaning the improvements there that have removed Iraq as the predominant election issue. They seem to long for when our soldiers were getting killed and the scorekeeping was on the front page.

June 23, 2008 at 11:31 AM 
Blogger David Diano said...

Wake up and smell the dead bodies. Iraq is still going badly.

June 24, 2008 at 7:17 PM 
Anonymous r said...

You seem to be the only one who thinks so, DD.

June 24, 2008 at 11:46 PM 
Anonymous r said...

Or, even you don’t really believe that but you keep repeating that tired old lie anyway just because you hate Bush. Hard to tell just which it is. But then, folks do call you Dishonest Dave so...

June 25, 2008 at 12:18 AM 
Blogger David Diano said...

Not just "me". The GAO report this week has made it clear that Iraq is not the success story that Bush paints it to be.

"The security environment remains volatile and dangerous."

"The number of Iraqi units capable of performing operations without US assistance has remained at 10%"

The Iraqi government has failed to pass legislation on oil resource sharing, provincial elections and complete a constitutional review.

Iraq has not followed through on commitments to spend more money on it's reconstruction efforts.

June 25, 2008 at 11:16 AM 
Anonymous r said...

No one has tried to claim things there are rosy. But certainly they are better than Lying Libs like you will ever admit.

June 25, 2008 at 11:27 AM 
Blogger David Diano said...

They're worse than you will admit.

Our soldiers are still getting killed. You would rather white-wash their deaths and bury your head in the sand over the real costs in American lives of this war.

June 25, 2008 at 11:53 AM 
Anonymous r said...

Quit yer weeping. 4000 < 60,000 in that Dem war Vietnam.

And you are one of the few angry dopes who still refuses to admit that "Bush's surge" was a success. What's that tell us about Dishonest Dave's level of hurt feelings petty partisanship that you will NEVER EVER give Bush credit for anything good? EVER. Like a school yard bully, you are! Lol...

June 25, 2008 at 1:13 PM 
Blogger David Diano said...

How many American dead are needed to satisfy your blood lust and hatred for our troops?

Would you prefer a Draft, so we can up our recruitment and death count?

Why don't you volunteer as a human shield?

June 25, 2008 at 10:41 PM 
Anonymous r said...

Lol... I'll take the point while you gather yourself.

June 26, 2008 at 1:06 AM 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home