Hey, Father Phleger is back. He of the observation that "America is the greatest sin against God" and a committed Obama supporter.
He says it won't be his or his colleague Rev. Jeremiah Wright's fault if Obama fails in bid for the presidency. He's right. It will be Obama's fault -- for associating so closely with a couple of anti-American lunatics for so long.
With friends like that who needs domestic terrorists?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDishonest Hypocrite Dave, you have no room to talk on this. Evereyone knows what you’d have to say about McCain had he attended a white supremacy church for 20 years. That the Obama camp and the LibDem opps along with their buddies in the Lying Lib Media have been desparately grasping to equate Obama’s 20 years at Wright’s Trinity to McCain’s passing interaction with Hagee is the height of dishonesty.
ReplyDeleteSome “change”, this.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteR
ReplyDeleteMcCain sought Hagees support.
And Obama sat in Wright's church for 20 years. 20 years. 20. Years.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteRandal
ReplyDelete"Dishonest Hypocrite Dave"- again resorting to calling names -"Evereyone knows what you’d have to say about McCain had he attended a white supremacy church for 20 years."- again assuming to know what others will say and think. -"Lying Lib Media" "LibDem opps"- More of your mindless bumper sticker mentality. Randal, Dave slammed you good on this one.
You're just not man enough to admit it.
Spencer, post something about North Korea. The administration should be credited for the progress with N.K. on this one by utilizing an international presence.
ReplyDeleteSteve
ReplyDeleteI agree. The administration does deserve credit for this one, and it proves that diplomacy CAN work, and it doesn't have to be at the end of a gun barrell. At the present, many are saying that all of the progress is symbolic, nevertheless, it's a start. Unfortunatly many neo-cons are saying we shouldn't even be talking to Kim Jong-il. Seems to me as though the progress in Korea is a good example of "catching more flies with honey than with vinegar." To bad it took 7 years for the administration to figure this out.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWiggle all ya want, Hypocrite Dave. If McCain had sat in a KKK church for 20 years you would not be nearly so quick to dismiss this as insignificant, ya liar.
ReplyDeleteWeeping Bob, get off my leg. You're really starting to sound like a little girl.
Yes, King George deserves much credit for winning our little cold war with North Korea. But the Dems and their buddies in the Lib Media won't give him due credit. Because that might -GASP!- reflect well on him! And they couldn't have that.
RR
ReplyDeleteHypocrite Dave, Weeping Bob, Lib Media. LOL
You make my point every time you post.
Pat Buchanan-6/27/08 "Bush failed with North Korea. Will he accept failure in Iran?
Bolton- Mr Bolton has described the softening of the US stance as "a very unfortunate decision".
Cheney- "I'm not going to be the one to announce this decision," the other participants recalled Cheney saying, pointing at himself. "You need to address your interest in this to the State Department."
Hell yes RR. I'd recognize them there Lefty Communist Lib Lib Lib Dems from a mile away.
But wait! NEWS FLASH! Didn't Rush Limbaugh say this is all Bill Clinton and Bill Richardsons doing! So now I'm confused RR. Help me out here. Do we give credit to the Bush administration, or the Clinton administration?
Get off your leg RR? You've been hangin out with Larry Craig again, haven't you?
When you make a point, BB, I’ll let you know. Now be a good little Mini Dave and stop humping my leg in your every post and maybe I’ll continue to give you a little charity Randal attention. Run along…
ReplyDeleteMaybe King George is just trying to tidy things up here in the last part of his reign. I recall last year when he got NK to back off on their nuke weapon program, this significant achievement got downplayed in the Lib Media.
RR
ReplyDeleteHow are you going to do that? You wouldn't a point if it poked you in the eye.
I’ll let you in on a little secret, BB… See, I’m not really that obnoxious a guy. I just do what I do the way I do it in order to draw out petty Lib whiners …and you fell into it like no one else here. Heck, even Dave doesn’t weep about my silly labeling like you do, he just gives it back to me. At the end of the day it’s all good. And you are still a petty and boring little hurt feelings nobody whiner who stabs his soldier son in the back.
ReplyDeleteI should also note that what I do is different than when Dave gets to calling everyone a “KKK Hitler Nazi” and the like. See, I jab with silly descriptive labels while he actually incorporates such meaningless crap as an integral part of his feeble and failed “arguments”. Lol…
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteRR
ReplyDeleteRandal, I understand. You can't defend your statements against my observations, so once again you resort to childlike actions, and ignore any valid arguments. I'll give you credit for this RR. You are consistant. As for your claim not to be obnoxious, in fact you are, and I can prove it.
You said you would spit in the face of a woman who's son died in Iraq. That RR, is the statement of an obnoxious person. Let's see if any of your fellow posters will disagree with that and defend your statement. And you never did find the nads to answer my question RR. Mary Tillman. Would you spit in her face too? How about Pat Tillman? Did he stab his fellow soldiers in the back by expressing his opposition to the war in Iraq?
Dave- The pointed head. Makes sense to me now. And I guess Randal thinks the point looks good under the white sheet.
You kids are conflating politics and policy. See, those Rights are in disagreement because of our good King removing NK from the terror list. They want him to hold a harder line. Reasonable people can disagree. My point was that when this all comes down and Bush should be heralded as a hero, much like Reagan stared down Russia, you Libs and your buddies in the Media won’t give him due credit ...because you no likey him.
ReplyDeleteSee, people can disagree without being freako Bush haters like you children.
Oh, and I sometimes call him King George as a slap at the petty Lib Hurt Feelings folks who stared calling him that, is all.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDave
ReplyDeleteI also had trouble understanding why R would refer to Bush as "King George". Sound's more like a reference that I would use.
RR said- "you Libs and your buddies in the Media won’t give him due credit ...because you no likey him."
I guess RR missed the first sentence of my post with Steve-
"I agree. The administration does deserve credit for this one, and it proves that diplomacy CAN work, and it doesn't have to be at the end of a gun barrell".
Dave
ReplyDeleteI guess RR no likey that.
I’m sorry, BB. I gotta admit, I don’t always read your boring posts. So I musta missed your cheap backhanded slap/compliment of our good King.
ReplyDeleteHey, speaking of cheapy weepy and whiny, was the dishonest letter in the DT today crying about the Delco GOP you? Man, are you sure you’re not a woman?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteRR
ReplyDeleteSorry to disappoint you. It wasn't me.
David
It must realy suck being Randal the man child.
Let's see, you come here crying like a little girl and bring your overly emotional and childish "arguments" but somehow I am the man child. Uh, ok, BB. Lol...
ReplyDelete