Sunday, August 3, 2008
posted by Spencerblog at
All the Repub corruption in the world will never equal the harm brought to our nation by Dem Liberalism. How about Alex Rose’s slanted expose on Weldon in today’s DT. Why the heck would he interview lying LibDem hacks like Frank Daly? Notice how Lib Daly couldn’t resist tossing in the unsubstantiated LibDem jab about the GOP redistricting to exclude blacks. And Rose felt the need to include the partisan quote. Not to mention that such Libs see nothing wrong with it when LibDems get to racial gerrymandering designed to give blacks more voting block power than their numbers warrant.
This comment has been removed by the author.
We get it, DDD. You're okay with gerrymandering that grants blacks undue power and helps Dem candidates, because you are a blind apologist and partisan.
The republican party could use another rebranding after this scandal. Hell, they could have used one after the last 2 or 3! They make it too easy for conspiracy theorists like diano to blame every decision they make on dishonest alterior motives. Does anyone here really doubt they'll lose more Senate and House seats in November?Contract with America 2 should be in draft mode if they knew what was good for them.
The filthy Dems have plenty dirt on their hands too. A lot of it is the Lib Media’s slant, S. Take for instance the AP piece today about the corrupt Dems in Harrisburg coming under indictment. The entire thing is all about the Dems and only about Dems and yet they weren’t mentioned in the head nor the sub head. Hell, the word “Democrats” didn’t even appear in the article until nine paragraphs in! For a grand total of TWO whole times! While we have come to well know that had this been about crooked Repubs, this would have been splashed both in the heading as well as throughout the article numerous times by the filthy Press Libs. The Lib Media is lying to you, folks.
And let us not forget that the very term “Gerrymandering” came about thanks to crooked Democrats manipulating district boundaries to their dishonest advantage. Although Repubs may play the game a bit sometimes now too, it is very much a Dem art.But then, I’m guessing this is why Dishonest Dave failed to mention this little factoid as well as why he doesn’t even use the word, opting instead for the less descriptive 'redistricting'. One need look no further for proof than the way the LibDems have manipulated boundaries in order to give blacks more voting clout disproportionate to what their numbers would warrant. But the Apologist Daves see no problem with this blatant power gifting. If blacks in great numbers voted Repub, you can bet your life that the Daves would start raising a stink about this too. Hypocrites are like that.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Create a Link
View my complete profile
Subscribe toPosts [Atom]