Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Mommy, What Are Those Two Men Doing? II

Provincetown meet Bristol City:

"Bristol City Council wants to prune bushes and remove cover from an area known as the Downs to improve the landscape and encourage rare wildlife.

"But its own gay rights group has opposed the move, claiming that cutting back the bushes was "discriminating" to homosexual men who used the area for late night outdoor sex known as dogging.

They need bushes for cover? What are they, prudes?

13 Comments:

Blogger David Diano said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

July 10, 2008 at 1:03 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Grasp on, Gay Apologist Dave.


gay rights group has opposed the move, claiming that cutting back the bushes was "discriminating" to homosexual men who used the area for late night outdoor sex known as dogging.


Funny what passes as "rights" and "discrimination" these days.
Up next: Cue the calls for repealing child rape laws because they violate the perverts' "rights" to rape kids.

July 10, 2008 at 10:02 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

sex known as dogging

YUCK! Leave the dogs alone!

July 10, 2008 at 10:30 AM 
Blogger steve mcdonald said...

dave, you figure that out on your own?

nasty stuff.

July 10, 2008 at 10:38 AM 
Blogger Pro Christ Pro Gun said...

Dumb Diano:

Liberals look to Europe to set our evolving standards of decency. I think that the point of the article was that the fags want to engage in illegal public sex under cover of "bush" so they avoid detection, and that the community wants no part of it.

If that local community is using its desire to trim bush as a means of bringing the fags out of their holes, then good for the community!

C. Scott Shields, Esquire
www.shieldsandhoppe.com

July 10, 2008 at 1:15 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

the fags out of their holes

EW!

July 10, 2008 at 4:13 PM 
Blogger David Diano said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

July 11, 2008 at 1:24 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What you call “progress” the rest of us call Lib slippery slope agenda implementation. Libs always push too far. Here, we’ve gone from ostracizing gays to beyond mere tolerance and acceptance all the way to fullblown celebration and promoting this lifestyle choice to school children. And somehow along the way gay marriage became an invented “right”. And decent straight people who disagree with all this Lib hogwash are put on the defensive as Gay has become the new normal.

Much as the Left and Black have pushed from white society racism all the way to acceptance of fullblown black reverse racism and paying slavery “reparations” to people who weren’t even alive back then.

You can call that “progress” if you want, I guess. Hardly seems like something to celebrate and crow about, Dishonest Dave. Only guilt ridden apologist dopes like you see it that way. It’s like Bizzaro Backwards Lib World.
Lib “progress” = a lie. Always.

July 11, 2008 at 10:29 AM 
Blogger Franny Ward said...

Question: Put 100 Fags and 100 Lesbos on a deserted island with enough food, water, medicine, etc to last 100 years.

In 100 years, what would one find?

200 dead people.

July 11, 2008 at 12:17 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Mommy, What are those two men doing" Just spreading disease that will eventually kill them dear, that's all.

July 12, 2008 at 9:48 AM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just got this in the mailbox this morning...

THE PLAN

A.. Back off and let those men who want to marry men, marry men.

B.. Allow those women who want to marry women, marry women.

C.. Allow those folks who want to abort their babies, abort their babies.

In three generations, there will be no Liberals.

July 12, 2008 at 12:16 PM 
Blogger David Diano said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

July 12, 2008 at 8:12 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If we can outlaw smoking “because of the healthcare cost burden put on others due to harmful personal choices of smokers”, as Libs say, then soo too we should outlaw homo rumphumping due to the spread of AIDS that we all end up picking up the costs for.

July 13, 2008 at 2:18 PM 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home