Monday, December 5, 2011

AIDS Lawyer Goes Judge Shopping?

An interesting point of notice in Delco HIV Kid vs. Milton Hershey School: The school made its court filing in a Harrisburg, the U.S. Court for the Middle District of Pa. The AIDS Law Project filed suit in Philadelphia, the Eastern District Court.

The alleged discrimination occured out there. So why did ALP lawyer Rhonda Goldfein file her case in Philadelphia? For the same reason most plaintiffs attempt to file in the city.

No doubt ALP lawyer Rhonda Goldfein believes she is more likely to get a more sympathetic judge and/or jury there. Somebody tell me I'm wrong.

UPDATE: Also noticed: In order to protect the identity of this 13-year-old kid the school refers to him as John Doe in its filing. But the ALP refers to him as Abraham Smith. I thought that was his real name, until I read in the ALP press release that said it wasn't. It too was a name made up to protect the boy's identity.

Give the ALP credit, Abraham Smith sounds a whole better than John Doe. It's downright presidential. The ALP has already won the Battle of the Pseudonyms.

UPDATE II: In response to yesterday's column in which I more or less defended the school's position I got an email from someone named Donald Delp who wrote:
you are an ignorant a--hole watch the ryan white story
I didn't watch the Ryan White Story, but I am certainly familiar with it. While I don't often rely on Wikipedia to get everything right, it provides the basics here:
Ryan Wayne White (December 6, 1971 – April 8, 1990)[1] was an American teenager from Kokomo, Indiana, who became a national poster child for HIV/AIDS in the United States, after being expelled from middle school because of his infection. A hemophiliac, he became infected with HIV from a contaminated blood treatment and, when diagnosed in December 1984, was given six months to live. Doctors said he posed no risk to other students, but AIDS was poorly understood at the time, and when White tried to return to school, many parents and teachers in Kokomo rallied against his attendance.[2] A lengthy legal battle with the school system ensued, and media coverage of the case made White into a national celebrity and spokesman for AIDS research and public education. He appeared frequently in the media with celebrities such as Elton John, Michael Jackson and Phil Donahue. Surprising his doctors, White lived five years longer than predicted and died in April 1990, one month prior to his high school graduation.
What this case has in common with the Ryan White story is not much and you have to be an AIDS activist, lawyer or liberal to think that it does.

AIDS activists and their lawyers are asserting that "Abraham Smith" poses and will pose no significant danger or risk to his classmates at the Milton Hershey School over the next four or five years. School officials however are not so sure. These kids live in a fairly cloistered environment and sexual activity is far from unheard of among their teenage students. Despite the school's best efforts to repress it, sex between students happens, sometimes with unfortunate consequences. But in this kid's case the consequences could go from being unfortunate to lethal. This is not a public, day school. It is a private, coed, boarding school and all that that entails.

We have learned a lot since Ryan White's day about how AIDS is and isn't spread between people. And with all we know, today AIDS is still the number one killer of African-American women between the ages of 24 and 44. Some 85 percent of these women get it from male sex partners who didn't tell them they were HIV positive.

It is pretty to think that Abraham Smith (between the ages of 13 and 18 and after) would never behave so irresponsibly. With the right counseling and self discipline there is a good chance that he won't. But who should be forced to risk the lives of 1,850 other children on that bet? And just who is being an ignorant a--hole here?

UPDATE III: This evening I spoke to Rob Duston, a lawyer for the school, who told me that the school never did actually file its request for judicial review in federal court, that they were beaten to the courthouse by Rhonda Goldfein. What we've been reading on the Internet is a "draft" of the school's proposed filing and it should have been labeled that way, he said, but it wasn't.

Still, the arguments will be the same ones that will be presented if the case goes to a judge.

I also spoke to Connie McNamara, the school's vice president of communications. More about that conversation tomorrow.

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

To answer your question: Not you... The lawsuit's issue is Abraham Smith/John Doe's rights. On the other side is the responsibility (italics, please) of the MHS Board to the other 1,850students. It is beyond my comprehension that any reasonable Court can make a reasoned decision to force MHS to accept Mr. Smith/Doe as a student. Whoops... Reasonable court? Reasoned decision? My bad...

December 5, 2011 at 7:16 PM 
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I just wanted to say I agree with your opinion of Hershey's decision not to admit this 13 year old boy with HIV. HIPPA states the school cannot disclose to others this child's illness and yet if he where to get hurt ie... fight, sports, etc most people don't have gloves to put on to protect themselves. And then there is the question of unprotected sex, and for those of you out there condoms do not protect you from HIV and other sexually contracted diseases.
Yet my question is this. How did they come about knowing this vitally protected information. If the child disclosed it on his application then he put it out there to be scrutinized and his application possibly rejected.

December 6, 2011 at 2:26 AM 
Blogger Lindsay L said...

"The student met all the other requirements for the program, which is free and serves low-income students from age 4 to 15, the suit said." Just a little food for thought. If this boy and his mother win (not saying they will or will not.) He will recieve alot of money for "compensation" (BLAH BLAH BLAH.) Upon accepting the money he would therefore no longer be elligible to apply for the school as it only accepts students from "LOW INCOME"households. What next? They are going to say they have to let him into this FREE non-profit school Even though he is rich? So wouldn't they then have to accept EVERYONE regardless of financial status, regardless if they can handle whatever these students bring to the table? Any student they deny admission to then have grounds for discrimination, why let one rich kid in and not all the others? This whole lawsuit is not right in so many ways

December 6, 2011 at 6:20 PM 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home